On Jun. 10, 2010, 17:06 +0300, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jun. 10, 2010, 16:35 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:33:37AM -0400, bfields wrote:
>>> The patch "pnfsd: fix test in nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device" was obviously
>>> correct; before that patch, nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device() returned the
>>> first device which did *not* match, instead of the first device which
>>> did.
>>>
>>> Other callers previous worked because they passed int the incorrect
>>> name, and because we never had more than one element in the list, so
>>> returning the first non-match would return the right thing.
>>
>> But then I don't know what point the "/dev/" is serving here. May as
>> well just change the interface so that what's passed in is just the name
>> ("sdc2" or whatever)--no use pretending this is some kind of path name
>> if it's not really.
>>
>> However, I don't know whether passing in the disk name is really a
>> sensible way to refer to a filesystem in a user<->kernel api.
>>
>
> up to you... I think the whole scheme is currently GFS2 specific
> and it assumes the device exists symmetrically on /dev/... on all
> DSs. The /dev prefix seems to be completely redundant.
> It makes more sense to get rid of it in the user->kernel
> API as passed down to nfsd4_set_pnfs_dlm_device() rather than
> adding it here.
A more through design could use the fs uuid rather than the device name
which is kinda volatile...
Benny
>
> Benny
>
>> --b.
>>
>>>
>>> But now we need to fix those callers.
>>>
>>> From: Eric Anderle <eanderle@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfsd/nfs4pnfsdlm.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4pnfsdlm.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4pnfsdlm.c
>>> index 84caa6e..5a66a71 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4pnfsdlm.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4pnfsdlm.c
>>> @@ -268,10 +268,13 @@ static int nfsd4_pnfs_dlm_getdevinfo(struct super_block *sb,
>>> /*
>>> * If the DS list has not been established, return -EINVAL
>>> */
>>> - dlm_pdev = nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device(sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
>>> + /* Long enough to hold "/dev/" + disk name */
>>> + char full_disk_name[6 + strlen(sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name)];
>>> + sprintf(full_disk_name, "/dev/%s", sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
>>> + dlm_pdev = nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device(full_disk_name);
>>> if (!dlm_pdev) {
>>> dprintk("%s: DEBUG: disk %s Not Found\n", __func__,
>>> - sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
>>> + full_disk_name);
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -364,7 +367,10 @@ static int dlm_ino_hash(struct inode *ino)
>>> /* If can't find the inode block device in the pnfs_dlm_deivce list
>>> * then don't hand out a layout
>>> */
>>> - de = nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device(ino->i_sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
>>> + /* Long enough to hold "/dev/" + disk name */
>>> + char full_disk_name[6 + strlen(ino->i_sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name)];
>>> + sprintf(full_disk_name, "/dev/%s", ino->i_sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name);
>>> + de = nfsd4_find_pnfs_dlm_device(full_disk_name);
>>> if (!de)
>>> return -1;
>>> hash_mask = de->num_ds - 1;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
