Re: [PATCH 13/24] pnfs_submit: read path changeover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 10:29 PM, Fred Isaman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2010 07:19 AM, Fred Isaman wrote:
>>>> Change readpages path to only call LAYOUTGET once.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  fs/nfs/pagelist.c |    2 ++
>>>>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c     |   37 +++++++------------------------------
>>>>  fs/nfs/pnfs.h     |   25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>>> index ed647b9..c3e5a1f 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>>> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ static int nfs_can_coalesce_requests(struct nfs_page *prev,
>>>>               return 0;
>>>>       if (prev->wb_pgbase + prev->wb_bytes != PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
>>>>               return 0;
>>>> +     if (req->wb_lseg != prev->wb_lseg)
>>>> +             return 0;
>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
>>>>       if (pgio->pg_test && !pgio->pg_test(pgio, prev, req))
>>>>               return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> index 2b5f6fc..692a18e 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>>> @@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ pnfs_readpages(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
>>>>  {
>>>>       struct nfs_readargs *args = &rdata->args;
>>>>       struct inode *inode = rdata->inode;
>>>> -     int numpages, status, pgcount, temp;
>>>> +     int numpages, pgcount, temp;
>>>>       struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
>>>>       struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
>>>>       struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>>>> @@ -1701,19 +1701,8 @@ pnfs_readpages(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
>>>>               args->count,
>>>>               args->offset);
>>>>
>>>> -     /* Retrieve and set layout if not allready cached */
>>>> -     status = _pnfs_update_layout(inode,
>>>> -                                 args->context,
>>>> -                                 args->count,
>>>> -                                 args->offset,
>>>> -                                 IOMODE_READ,
>>>> -                                 &lseg);
>>>> -     if (status) {
>>>> -             dprintk("%s: Updating layout failed (%d), retry with NFS \n",
>>>> -                     __func__, status);
>>>> -             trypnfs = PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED;
>>>> -             goto out;
>>>> -     }
>>>> +     lseg = rdata->req->wb_lseg;
>>>> +     get_lseg(lseg);
>>>>
>>>>       /* Determine number of pages. */
>>>>       pgcount = args->pgbase + args->count;
>>>> @@ -1740,7 +1729,6 @@ pnfs_readpages(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
>>>>               rdata->pdata.lseg = NULL;
>>>>               put_lseg(lseg);
>>>>       }
>>>> - out:
>>>>       dprintk("%s End (trypnfs:%d)\n", __func__, trypnfs);
>>>>       return trypnfs;
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -1749,21 +1737,10 @@ enum pnfs_try_status
>>>>  _pnfs_try_to_read_data(struct nfs_read_data *data,
>>>>                      const struct rpc_call_ops *call_ops)
>>>>  {
>>>> -     struct inode *ino = data->inode;
>>>> -     struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(ino);
>>>> -
>>>> -     dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
>>>> -     /* Only create an rpc request if utilizing NFSv4 I/O */
>>>> -     if (!pnfs_enabled_sb(nfss) ||
>>>> -         !nfss->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops->read_pagelist) {
>>>> -             dprintk("<-- %s: not using pnfs\n", __func__);
>>>> -             return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED;
>>>> -     } else {
>>>> -             dprintk("%s: Utilizing pNFS I/O\n", __func__);
>>>> -             data->pdata.call_ops = call_ops;
>>>> -             data->pdata.pnfs_error = 0;
>>>> -             return pnfs_readpages(data);
>>>> -     }
>>>
>>> Wahoo, nice stuff Ha
>>>
>>> By now this can go into it's only caller.
>>> (And caller de-inlined, what was that all about)
>>>
>>>> +     dprintk("%s: Utilizing pNFS I/O\n", __func__);
>>>> +     data->pdata.call_ops = call_ops;
>>>> +     data->pdata.pnfs_error = 0;
>>>> +     return pnfs_readpages(data);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  enum pnfs_try_status
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> index 6326ed5..816ebe1 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>>> @@ -94,22 +94,29 @@ static inline int pnfs_enabled_sb(struct nfs_server *nfss)
>>>>       return nfss->pnfs_curr_ld != NULL;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline void _pnfs_clear_lseg_from_pages(struct list_head *head)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct nfs_page *req;
>>>> +
>>>> +     list_for_each_entry(req, head, wb_list) {
>>>> +             put_lseg(req->wb_lseg);
>>>> +             req->wb_lseg = NULL;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static inline enum pnfs_try_status
>>>>  pnfs_try_to_read_data(struct nfs_read_data *data,
>>>>                     const struct rpc_call_ops *call_ops)
>>>
>>> Don't think this needs to be inline, whats the point?
>>>
>>
>> The point is that it is in the header file, not a c file.
>>
>
> That's what I meant. Why is it in the header file. Why not
> in .c file and declared.
>

To make it easy to ifdef out if CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is not set.

Fred

>> Fred
>>
>
> (-Bz
>
>>>>  {
>>>> -     struct inode *inode = data->inode;
>>>> -     struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
>>>>       enum pnfs_try_status ret;
>>>>
>>>> -     /* FIXME: read_pagelist should probably be mandated */
>>>> -     if (PNFS_EXISTS_LDIO_OP(nfss, read_pagelist))
>>>> -             ret = _pnfs_try_to_read_data(data, call_ops);
>>>> -     else
>>>> -             ret = PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED;
>>>> -
>>>> +     if (!data->req->wb_lseg)
>>>> +             return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED;
>>>> +     ret = _pnfs_try_to_read_data(data, call_ops);
>>>>       if (ret == PNFS_ATTEMPTED)
>>>> -             nfs_inc_stats(inode, NFSIOS_PNFS_READ);
>>>> +             nfs_inc_stats(data->inode, NFSIOS_PNFS_READ);
>>>> +     else
>>>> +             _pnfs_clear_lseg_from_pages(&data->pages);
>>>>       return ret;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>
>>> Boaz
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux