Fred, how does that patch interact with 285052f pnfs_post_submit: Restore "pnfs: pnfs_do_flush" and the latter patches that depend on it? Benny On Jun. 08, 2010, 7:19 +0300, Fred Isaman <iisaman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Preparing for LAYUTGET invocation in nfs_write_begin to be the > only invocation in the write path. > > It isn't used at all yet, but it should be properly referenced/dereferenced > > Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/nfs/file.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c > index 03601d2..fde6cb5 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/file.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c > @@ -420,6 +420,8 @@ static int nfs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, > file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name, > mapping->host->i_ino, len, (long long) pos); > > + pnfs_update_layout(mapping->host, NULL, NFS4_MAX_UINT64, 0, IOMODE_RW, > + (struct pnfs_layout_segment **) fsdata); > start: > /* > * Prevent starvation issues if someone is doing a consistency > @@ -428,11 +430,13 @@ start: > ret = wait_on_bit(&NFS_I(mapping->host)->flags, NFS_INO_FLUSHING, > nfs_wait_bit_killable, TASK_KILLABLE); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + goto out; > > page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, index, flags); > - if (!page) > - return -ENOMEM; > + if (!page) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > *pagep = page; > > ret = nfs_flush_incompatible(file, page); > @@ -447,6 +451,11 @@ start: > if (!ret) > goto start; > } > + out: > + if (ret) { > + put_lseg(*fsdata); > + *fsdata = NULL; > + } > return ret; > } > > @@ -486,6 +495,7 @@ static int nfs_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, > > unlock_page(page); > page_cache_release(page); > + put_lseg(fsdata); > > if (status < 0) > return status; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html