Re: nfs_access_cache_shrinker() is missing an unlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:22 +0100, David Howells wrote: 
> Hi Trond,
> 
> nfs_access_cache_shrinker() incurs the attached lockdep warning and then locks
> up.
> 
> Specifically, the problem appears to be the:
> 
> 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> 
> in the loop, for which there's not an unlock.  Nor is there an unlock in
> nfs_access_free_list() or nfs_access_free_entry.
> 
> Is the spin_unlock() supposed to occur at the end of the loop, just before the
> closing brace?  Or did you mean to defer the unlock to nfs_access_free_entry()?

Oh, crap... That's a typo in commit
9c7e7e23371e629dbb3b341610a418cdf1c19d91. I did not intend to remove the
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock) line.

Thanks for spotting that!

Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux