Re: TMPFS over NFSv4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 May 2010 02:57:30 -0700
Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi
> <btharindu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > thankx a lot Hugh ... I will try this out ... (bit harder patch
> > already patched SLES kernel :-p ) ....
> 
> If patch conflicts are a problem, you really only need to put in the
> two-liner patch to mm/mmap.c: Alan was seeking perfection in
> the rest of the patch, but you can get away without it.
> 
> >
> > BTW, what does Alan means by "strict overcommit" ?
> 
> Ah, that phrase, yes, it's a nonsense, but many of us do say it by mistake.
> Alan meant to say "strict no-overcommit".

No I always meant to say 'strict overcommit'. It avoids excess negatives
and "no noovercommit" discussions.

I guess 'strict overcommit control' would have been clearer 8)

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux