Re: [PATCH 08/15] SUNRPC: Ensure rpcauth_prune_expired() respects the nr_to_scan parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/13/10 05:08 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust<Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/sunrpc/auth.c |    5 ++---
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
index 2213dc5..5fb02ac 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ rpcauth_prune_expired(struct list_head *free, int nr_to_scan)

  	list_for_each_entry_safe(cred, next,&cred_unused, cr_lru) {

+		if (nr_to_scan-- == 0)
+			break;
  		/*
  		 * Enforce a 60 second garbage collection moratorium
  		 * Note that the cred_unused list must be time-ordered.
@@ -255,11 +257,8 @@ rpcauth_prune_expired(struct list_head *free, int nr_to_scan)
  			get_rpccred(cred);
  			list_add_tail(&cred->cr_lru, free);
  			rpcauth_unhash_cred_locked(cred);
-			nr_to_scan--;
  		}
  		spin_unlock(cache_lock);
-		if (nr_to_scan == 0)
-			break;
  	}
  	return (number_cred_unused / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
  }

It looks to me like the mm calls our cache shrinker with nr_to_scan set to zero when it just wants this return value, and nothing more. But the logic here seems to assume that nr_to_scan == 0 means shrink as much as you can. Am I reading this correctly?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux