On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 13/05/2010 01:21, Kevin Coffman a écrit : >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Guillaume Rousse >> <Guillaume.Rousse@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Le 05/05/2010 23:18, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : >>>> I'm attaching network capture, even I can't figure additional >>>> information from it by myself. >>> Reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562807, I rebuild >>> libtirpc with patch applied and -DDEBUG. Unfortunatly, it doesn't bring >>> additional information about the server-side failure :( >> >> It looks to me like fflush(), called in qword_eol(), may be returning >> the number of bytes flushed (95) rather than zero for success? I >> don't immediately see any changes that would cause this. But I >> haven't looked extensively... > Not necessarily a change: I never used a kerberized server sofar, only > clients. Well, I've not seen that issue before, so I assumed it was a change. I looked back a bit, but didn't see: what versions of nfs-utils and kernel are on the server? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
