Re: [PATCH] make capabilities support optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/26/2010 12:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 April 2010 12:10:00 Steve Dickson wrote:
>> On 04/26/2010 11:24 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> At the very least, I think the man page should mention this bug somehow,
>>> and maybe a warning should be generated during the build.  Since this is
>>> mostly for embedded systems, according to Mike, I doubt an actual
>>> generated run-time warning would be visible to anyone.
>>
>> Mike would you be willing to test this out and document any
>> differences in statd behaviour with and without that config
>> flag set?
> 
> i think a BUGS section in statd is sufficient, but if you wanted to go 
> further, then a simple syslog() would be OK as well.  dumping warnings to 
> stderr/stdout is obnoxious and non-standard for daemons.  those really only 
> should be written when a daemon is quitting due to misconfiguration.
I agree... a blurb in the BUGS section is all that is needed..
> 
> i can send a patch for the man page, but i'd only copy and paste what Chuck 
> wrote (about statd remaining registered upon exit).
That would be good... thanks!

steved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux