I'll admit that it's unlikely for the first allocation to fail and
the second one to succeed. I won't be offended if you ignore this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index eda74c4..f9254fb 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5107,6 +5107,7 @@ static int nfs41_proc_async_sequence(struct nfs_client *clp,
res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!args || !res) {
kfree(args);
+ kfree(res);
nfs_put_client(clp);
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
