On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:05:53PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:59:13PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > I've made quite a few changes here - it might be worth splitting them
> > up.
>
> Probably so.
So, if I first revert b292cf9 and then b0401d7, I get the following.
I don't understand the "return 0" in the XPT_CLOSE case. Is it really
OK for the caller to try to process this request?
--b.
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 8f0f1fb..48f91fb 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -706,9 +706,11 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
len = 0;
+
if (test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
dprintk("svc_recv: found XPT_CLOSE\n");
svc_delete_xprt(xprt);
+ return 0;
} else if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
@@ -735,19 +737,20 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
svc_xprt_received(newxpt);
}
svc_xprt_received(xprt);
- } else {
- dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, transport %p, inuse=%d\n",
- rqstp, pool->sp_id, xprt,
- atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount));
- rqstp->rq_deferred = svc_deferred_dequeue(xprt);
- if (rqstp->rq_deferred) {
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
- len = svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
- } else
- len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_recvfrom(rqstp);
- dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
+ return 0;
}
+ dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, transport %p, inuse=%d\n",
+ rqstp, pool->sp_id, xprt,
+ atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount));
+ rqstp->rq_deferred = svc_deferred_dequeue(xprt);
+ if (rqstp->rq_deferred)
+ len = svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
+ else
+ len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_recvfrom(rqstp);
+ dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
+ svc_xprt_received(xprt);
+
/* No data, incomplete (TCP) read, or accept() */
if (len == 0 || len == -EAGAIN) {
rqstp->rq_res.len = 0;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 9e09391..cc68137 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
dprintk("svc: recvfrom returned error %d\n", -err);
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
}
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
return -EAGAIN;
}
len = svc_addr_len(svc_addr(rqstp));
@@ -562,11 +561,6 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
svsk->sk_sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp;
set_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags); /* there may be more data... */
- /*
- * Maybe more packets - kick another thread ASAP.
- */
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
-
len = skb->len - sizeof(struct udphdr);
rqstp->rq_arg.len = len;
@@ -917,7 +911,6 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (len < want) {
dprintk("svc: short recvfrom while reading record "
"length (%d of %d)\n", len, want);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
goto err_again; /* record header not complete */
}
@@ -953,7 +946,6 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (len < svsk->sk_reclen) {
dprintk("svc: incomplete TCP record (%d of %d)\n",
len, svsk->sk_reclen);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
goto err_again; /* record not complete */
}
len = svsk->sk_reclen;
@@ -961,10 +953,9 @@ static int svc_tcp_recv_record(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
return len;
error:
- if (len == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (len == -EAGAIN)
dprintk("RPC: TCP recv_record got EAGAIN\n");
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
- }
+
return len;
err_delete:
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
@@ -1109,18 +1100,14 @@ out:
svsk->sk_tcplen = 0;
svc_xprt_copy_addrs(rqstp, &svsk->sk_xprt);
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
if (serv->sv_stats)
serv->sv_stats->nettcpcnt++;
return len;
err_again:
- if (len == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (len == -EAGAIN)
dprintk("RPC: TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN\n");
- svc_xprt_received(&svsk->sk_xprt);
- return len;
- }
error:
if (len != -EAGAIN) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: recvfrom returned errno %d\n",
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
index f92e37e..0194de8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
@@ -566,7 +566,6 @@ static int rdma_read_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
ret, rqstp->rq_arg.len, rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_base,
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len);
- svc_xprt_received(rqstp->rq_xprt);
return ret;
}
@@ -665,7 +664,6 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
rqstp->rq_arg.head[0].iov_len);
rqstp->rq_prot = IPPROTO_MAX;
svc_xprt_copy_addrs(rqstp, xprt);
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
return ret;
close_out:
@@ -678,6 +676,5 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
*/
set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
defer:
- svc_xprt_received(xprt);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
