On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:50:18PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > The tests are primarily meant to test protocol conformance. So they > shouldn't be reporting failures on conforming behavior. > > Perhaps it would also be interesting to run the tests in a mode which > probes and summarizes server characteristics (maximum supported offset, > supported features, etc.), but that's a job for another day. Hm, actually another alternative would be just to keep these tests, but to *always* allow them to succeed. Or to fail only if the server returns an error that really is totally wrong. Even if we don't much care about the results, sending operations with extreme values for the arguments may still help make sure server's don't skimp on the range-checking and crash in some lower-level code. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
