Not having an fscache cookie is perfectly valid if the user didn't mount with the fscache option. This patch fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15234 Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx --- fs/nfs/fscache.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/fscache.c b/fs/nfs/fscache.c index fa58800..534adb8 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/fscache.c +++ b/fs/nfs/fscache.c @@ -355,11 +355,11 @@ void nfs_fscache_reset_inode_cookie(struct inode *inode) int nfs_fscache_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp) { struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(page->mapping->host); - struct fscache_cookie *cookie = nfsi->fscache; - - BUG_ON(!cookie); if (PageFsCache(page)) { + struct fscache_cookie *cookie = nfsi->fscache; + + BUG_ON(!cookie); dfprintk(FSCACHE, "NFS: fscache releasepage (0x%p/0x%p/0x%p)\n", cookie, page, nfsi); -- 1.6.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html