On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:47 +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Hmm.... There is a known problem with a reference leak in > > nfs_wb_page_cancel() (I've queued up a fix for 2.6.33 in the 'bugfixes' > > branch of my git tree already). What happens when you apply the > > following patch? > The not helps, still get the same oops(log follows). > Have you tried my testcase? > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000040 > IP: [<f80d415f>] nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs] > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/thinkpad_acpi/leds/tpacpi::thinkvantage/uevent > Modules linked in: binfmt_misc quota_v2 quota_tree nfsd exportfs nfs lockd sunrpc iwl3945 thinkpad_acpi psmouse led_class serio_raw iwlcore nvram raid1 raid0 linear e1000e > > Pid: 1035, comm: nfsiod Not tainted 2.6.33-rc6 #60 2623DDU/2623DDU > EIP: 0060:[<f80d415f>] EFLAGS: 00010296 CPU: 0 > EIP is at nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs] > EAX: 00000000 EBX: c2561d80 ECX: c06d3700 EDX: 00000014 > ESI: f69916c0 EDI: f80dab58 EBP: f6724ef4 ESP: f6724ee8 > DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 > Process nfsiod (pid: 1035, ti=f6724000 task=f69dda90 task.ti=f6724000) > Stack: > c04df67d f69d7440 f69916c0 f6724f34 f80d4258 f6724f44 00001b0e 00000000 > <0> ffff799c 00000400 f505f000 94c0042a f69917e0 f69917e8 00000000 f69916c0 > <0> f69916c4 f69916c0 f80dab58 f6724f3c f8075703 f6724f58 f8075871 f6724f60 > Call Trace: > [<c04df67d>] ? schedule+0x3ad/0xa30 > [<f80d4258>] ? nfs_commit_release+0x88/0x1a0 [nfs] > [<f8075703>] ? rpc_release_calldata+0x13/0x20 [sunrpc] > [<f8075871>] ? rpc_free_task+0x41/0x70 [sunrpc] > [<c01acc4c>] ? probe_workqueue_execution+0x8c/0xd0 > [<f8075940>] ? rpc_async_release+0x10/0x20 [sunrpc] > [<c015834d>] ? worker_thread+0x10d/0x210 > [<f8075930>] ? rpc_async_release+0x0/0x20 [sunrpc] > [<c015bb10>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 > [<c0158240>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x210 > [<c015b724>] ? kthread+0x74/0x80 > [<c015b6b0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80 > [<c0103546>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 > Code: f0 0f ba 70 28 01 19 d2 31 c0 85 d2 75 0e 8b 5d f8 8b 75 fc 89 ec 5d c3 8d 74 26 00 89 d8 ba 10 00 00 00 e8 74 0e 10 c8 8b 43 10 <8b> 70 40 9c 5b fa e8 26 67 0d c8 8d 46 30 b9 ff ff ff ff 0f bd > EIP: [<f80d415f>] nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs] SS:ESP 0068:f6724ee8 > CR2: 0000000000000040 > ---[ end trace 4bf8ee9d233ce744 ]--- Yep. Looking more carefully at your test case, I don't see how truncate_inode_page() can be involved at all. You are extending the file using lseek(), not truncate(). So something else must be at work here. I'll see if I can reproduce it. Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
