On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 05:15:45PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> int nfs_wb_nocommit(struct inode *inode)
> {
> - return nfs_write_mapping(inode->i_mapping, FLUSH_NOCOMMIT);
> + return filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
Any point in keeping this as a wrapper for a single well-documented
caller? Also taking i_mutex around it seems a bit questionable these
days given that filemap_write_and_wait avoids lifelocks with writing
applications okay and we use it without i_mutex all over the place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
