Historical reason for NFS_MOUNT_FLAGMASK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Historical reason for NFS_MOUNT_FLAGMASK?
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:23:09 -0400

I'm looking for some bits in the nfs_mount_data.flags, and wondering why we
have only 16 bits masked off due to:

#define NFS_MOUNT_FLAGMASK     0xFFFF

Does anyone recall why we've limited the ABI to 16 bits here?

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Historical reason for NFS_MOUNT_FLAGMASK?
  - From: Benjamin Coddington

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: add a rpc_clnt shutdown control in debugfs
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/1] NFS: New mount option force_rdirplus
Previous by thread: [PATCH] sunrpc: add a rpc_clnt shutdown control in debugfs
Next by thread: Re: Historical reason for NFS_MOUNT_FLAGMASK?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux