Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfs-utils: nfsdctl: dont ignore rdma listener return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/13/25 10:47 AM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> Don't ignore return code of adding rdma listener. If nfs.conf has asked
> for "rdma=y" but adding the listener fails, don't ignore the failure.
> Note in soft-rdma-provider environment (such as soft iwarp, soft roce),
> when no address-constraints are used, an "any" listener is created and
> rdma-enabling is done independently.

This behavior is confusing... I suggest that an nfs.conf man page
update accompany the below code change.

Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>


> Fixes: e3b72007ab31 ("nfs-utils: nfsdctl: cleanup listeners if some failed")
> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c b/utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c
> index 05fecc71..244910ef 100644
> --- a/utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c
> +++ b/utils/nfsdctl/nfsdctl.c
> @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ static int configure_listeners(void)
>  			if (tcp)
>  				ret = add_listener("tcp", n->field, port);
>  			if (rdma)
> -				add_listener("rdma", n->field, rdma_port);
> +				ret = add_listener("rdma", n->field, rdma_port);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
>  		}
> @@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ static int configure_listeners(void)
>  		if (tcp)
>  			ret = add_listener("tcp", "", port);
>  		if (rdma)
> -			add_listener("rdma", "", rdma_port);
> +			ret = add_listener("rdma", "", rdma_port);
>  	}
>  	return ret;
>  }


-- 
Chuck Lever




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux