Re: `rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU` and spinning kworker `rpciod`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/2/25 8:35 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 02:52:38PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2024, at 4:39 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 02:52:47PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>>>> Dear Salvatore, dear Chuck,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your messages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 30.07.24 um 14:19 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 09:19:24PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 2024, at 5:15 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:33:24AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Using Linux 5.15.160 on a Dell PowerEdge T440/021KCD, BIOS 2.11.2
>>>>>>>>> 04/22/2021, a mount from another server hung. Linux logs:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>> $ dmesg -T
>>>>>>>>> [Wed Jul  3 16:39:34 2024] Linux version 5.15.160.mx64.476(root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc (GCC) 12.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41) #1 SMP Wed Jun 5 12:24:15 CEST 2024
>>>>>>>>> [Wed Jul  3 16:39:34 2024] Command line: root=LABEL=root ro crashkernel=64G-:256M console=ttyS0,115200n8 console=tty0 init=/bin/systemd audit=0 random.trust_cpu=on systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy
>>>>>>>>> […]
>>>>>>>>> [Wed Jul  3 16:39:34 2024] DMI: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T440/021KCD, BIOS 2.11.2 04/22/2021
>>>>>>>>> […]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 06:00:10 2024] md: md3: data-check interrupted.
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:06:01 2024] receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ee580afa xid 6890a3d2
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:06:01 2024] receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000d4d84570 xid 3ca4017a
>>>>>
>>>>> […]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:35:59 2024] receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000028481e8f xid b682b676
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:35:59 2024] receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000c384ff38 xid b5d5dbf5
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] rcu:  13-....: (20997 ticks this GP) idle=54f/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=31904928/31904928 fqs=4433
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  (t=21017 jiffies g=194958993 q=5715)
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] Task dump for CPU 13:
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] task:kworker/u34:2   state:R  running task stack:    0 pid:30413 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004008
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] Call Trace:
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  <IRQ>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  sched_show_task.cold+0xc2/0xda
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa1/0xd3
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0xc7/0x1e7
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? trigger_load_balance+0x6d/0x300
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? scheduler_tick+0xda/0x260
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  update_process_times+0xa1/0xe0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  tick_sched_timer+0x8e/0xa0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x90/0x90
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x139/0x2a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  hrtimer_interrupt+0xf4/0x210
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0xe0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x90
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  </IRQ>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  <TASK>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] RIP: 0010:read_tsc+0x3/0x20
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 8b 05 56 ab 72 01 c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 01 f9 <66> 90 48 c1 e2 20 48 09 d0 c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] RSP: 0018:ffffc900087cfe00 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] RAX: 00000000226dc8b8 RBX: 000000003f3c079e RCX: 000000000000100d
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] RDX: 00000000004535c4 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: ffffffff82435600
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] RBP: 0003ed08d3641da3 R08: ffffffffa012c770 R09: ffffffffa012c788
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000283 R12: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88909311c000 R15: ffff88909311c005
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ktime_get+0x38/0xa0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? rpc_sleep_on_priority+0x70/0x70 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  rpc_exit_task+0x9a/0x100 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  __rpc_execute+0x6e/0x410 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  process_one_work+0x1d7/0x3a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3c0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? process_one_work+0x3a0/0x3a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  kthread+0x115/0x140
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:36:40 2024]  </TASK>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] rcu:  7-....: (21000 ticks this GP) idle=5b1/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=29984492/29984492 fqs=5159
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  (t=21017 jiffies g=194959001 q=2008)
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] Task dump for CPU 7:
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] task:kworker/u34:2   state:R  running task stack:    0 pid:30413 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004008
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] Call Trace:
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  <IRQ>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  sched_show_task.cold+0xc2/0xda
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa1/0xd3
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0xc7/0x1e7
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ? trigger_load_balance+0x6d/0x300
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ? scheduler_tick+0xda/0x260
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  update_process_times+0xa1/0xe0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  tick_sched_timer+0x8e/0xa0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x90/0x90
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x139/0x2a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  hrtimer_interrupt+0xf4/0x210
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0xe0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x90
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  </IRQ>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  <TASK>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x20
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] Code: b8 00 02 00 00 f0 0f c1 07 a9 ff 01 00 00 75 05 c3 cc cc cc cc e9 f0 05 59 ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 f0 0f b1 17 <75> 05 c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e9 62 02 59 ff 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 fa
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] RSP: 0018:ffffc900087cfe30 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88997131a500 RCX: 0000000000000001
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88997131a500 RDI: ffffffffa012c700
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] RBP: ffffffffa012c700 R08: ffffffffa012c770 R09: ffffffffa012c788
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000283 R12: ffff88997131a530
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88909311c000 R15: ffff88909311c005
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  __rpc_execute+0x95/0x410 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  process_one_work+0x1d7/0x3a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3c0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ? process_one_work+0x3a0/0x3a0
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  kthread+0x115/0x140
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:19 2024]  </TASK>
>>>>>>>>> [Tue Jul 16 11:37:57 2024] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>>>>>>>>> […]
>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, on one NFS server occurence we are seeing something very close
>>>>>>>> to the above but in the 5.10.y case for the Debian kernel after
>>>>>>>> updating to 5.10.218-1 to 5.10.221-1, so kernel after which had the
>>>>>>>> big NFS related stack backported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One backtrace we were able to catch was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:52 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000003d26f7ec xid b172e1c6
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:52 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000017f1552a xid a90d7751
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:52 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000006337c521 xid 8e5e58bd
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:54 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000cbf89319 xid c2da3c73
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:54 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000e2588a21 xid a01bfec6
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:24:54 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000005fda63ca xid c2eeeaa6
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: rcu:         15-....: (5250 ticks this GP) idle=74e/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=3160997/3161006 fqs=2233
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:         (t=5255 jiffies g=8381377 q=106333)
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: NMI backtrace for cpu 15
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: CPU: 15 PID: 3725556 Comm: kworker/u42:4 Not tainted 5.10.0-31-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.221-1
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: Hardware name: DALCO AG S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  <IRQ>
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  dump_stack+0x6b/0x83
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x32/0x69
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu+0x80/0x80
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xdf/0xf0
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa5/0xd7
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x202/0x3d9
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? trigger_load_balance+0x5a/0x220
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  update_process_times+0x8c/0xc0
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  tick_sched_handle+0x22/0x60
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  tick_sched_timer+0x65/0x80
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x90/0x90
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x127/0x280
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x2c0
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5c/0xe0
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  </IRQ>
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: RIP: 0010:mod_delayed_work_on+0x5d/0x90
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: Code: 00 4c 89 e7 e8 34 fe ff ff 89 c3 83 f8 f5 74 e9 85 c0 78 1b 89 ef 4c 89 f1 4c 89 e2 4c 89 ee e8 f9 fc ff ff 48 8b 3c 24 57 9d <0f> 1f 44 >
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb5efe356fd90 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000003820000f
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: RDX: 0000000038000000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: RBP: 0000000000002000 R08: ffffffffc0884430 R09: ffffffffc0884448
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffffffffc0884428
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel: R13: ffff8c89d0f6b800 R14: 00000000000001f4 R15: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  __rpc_sleep_on_priority_timeout+0x111/0x120 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_delay+0x56/0x90 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_exit_task+0x5a/0x140 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? __rpc_do_wake_up_task_on_wq+0x1e0/0x1e0 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  __rpc_execute+0x6d/0x410 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  process_one_work+0x1b3/0x350
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  kthread+0x118/0x140
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
>>>>>>>> Jul 27 15:25:15 nfsserver kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there anything which could help debug this issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The backtrace suggests an issue in the RPC client code; the
>>>>>>> server's NFSv4.1 backchannel would use that to send callbacks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since 5.10.218 and 5.10.221 are only about a thousand commits
>>>>>>> apart, a bisect should be quick and narrow down the issue to
>>>>>>> one or two commits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes indeed. Unfortunately was yet unable to reproduce the issue in
>>>>>> more syntentic way on test environment, and the affected server in
>>>>>> particular is a production system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul, is your case in some way reproducible in a testing environment
>>>>>> so that a bisection might be give enough hints on the problem?
>>>>> We hit this issue once more on the same server with Linux 5.15.160, and had
>>>>> to hard reboot it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately we did not have time yet to set up a test system to find a
>>>>> reproducer. In our cases a lot of compute servers seem to have accessed the
>>>>> NFS server. A lot of the many processes were `zstd` on a first glance.
>>>>
>>>> So we neither, due to the nature of the server (production system) and
>>>> unability to reproduce the issue under some more controlled way and on
>>>> test environment.
>>>>
>>>> In our case users seems to cause workloads involving use of wandb.
>>>>
>>>> What we tried is to boot the recent kernel from 5.10.y series avaiable
>>>> (5.10.223-1). Then the issue showed up still. Since we disabled
>>>> fs.leases-enable the situation seems to be more stable). While this
>>>> is/might not be the solution, does that gives some additional hits?
>>>
>>> The problem is backchannel-related, and disabling delegation
>>> will reduce the number of backchannel operations. Your finding
>>> comports with our current theory, but I can't think of how it
>>> narrows the field of suspects.
>>>
>>> Is the server running short on memory, perhaps? One backchannel
>>> operation that was added in v5.10.220 is CB_RECALL_ANY, which
>>> is triggered on memory exhaustion. But that should be a fairly
>>> harmless addition unless there is a bug in there somewhere.
>>>
>>> If your NFS server does not have any NFS mounts, then we could
>>> provide instructions for enabling client-side tracing to watch
>>> the details of callback traffic.
>>
>> The NFS server acts as well as NFS client, so tracing more
>> back-channel related will I guess just load the tracing more.
>>
>> But we got "lucky" and we were able to trigger the issue twice in last
>> days, once NFSv4 delegations were enabled again and some users started
>> to cause more load on the specific server as well.
>>
>> I did issue 
>>
>> 	rpcdebug -m rpc -c
>>
>> before rebooting/resetting the server  which is
>>
>> Jan 30 05:27:05 nfsserver kernel: 26407 2281   -512 3d1fdb92        0        0 79bc1aa5 nfs4_cbv1 CB_RECALL_ANY a:rpc_exit_task [sunrpc] q:delayq
>>
>> and the first RPC related soft lookup slapt in the log/journal I was
>> able to gather is:
>>
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#11 stuck for 23s! [kworker/u42:3:705574]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: Modules linked in: binfmt_misc rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs fscache bonding quota_v2 quota_tree ipmi_ssif intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common skx_edac skx_edac_common nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel libaes crypto_simd cryptd ast glue_helper drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper rapl acpi_ipmi ttm iTCO_wdt intel_cstate ipmi_si intel_pmc_bxt drm_kms_helper mei_me iTCO_vendor_support ipmi_devintf cec ioatdma intel_uncore pcspkr evdev joydev sg i2c_algo_bit watchdog mei dca ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad button fuse drm configfs nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod dm_mod hid_generic usbhid hid sd_mod t10_pi crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic xhci_pci ahci xhci_hcd libahci i40e libata
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  crct10dif_pclmul arcmsr crct10dif_common ptp crc32_pclmul usbcore crc32c_intel scsi_mod pps_core i2c_i801 lpc_ich i2c_smbus wmi usb_common
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: CPU: 11 PID: 705574 Comm: kworker/u42:3 Not tainted 5.10.0-33-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.226-1
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: Hardware name: DALCO AG S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: RIP: 0010:ktime_get+0x7b/0xa0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: Code: d1 e9 48 f7 d1 48 89 c2 48 85 c1 8b 05 ae 2c a5 02 8b 0d ac 2c a5 02 48 0f 45 d5 8b 35 7e 2c a5 02 41 39 f4 75 9e 48 0f af c2 <48> 01 f8 48 d3 e8 48 01 d8 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc f3 90 eb 84
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffa1aca9227e00 EFLAGS: 00000202
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: RAX: 0000371a545e1910 RBX: 000005fce82a4372 RCX: 0000000000000018
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: RDX: 000000000078efbe RSI: 000000000031f238 RDI: 00385c1353c92824
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffffc081f410 R09: ffffffffc081f410
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 000000000031f238
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: R13: ffff8ed42bf34830 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8ee94f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: CR2: 00007ffddf306080 CR3: 00000017c420a002 CR4: 00000000007706e0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: PKRU: 55555554
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  <IRQ>
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? watchdog_timer_fn+0x1bb/0x210
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? lockup_detector_update_enable+0x50/0x50
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x127/0x280
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x2c0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5c/0xe0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  </IRQ>
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? ktime_get+0x7b/0xa0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_exit_task+0x96/0x140 [sunrpc]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? __rpc_do_wake_up_task_on_wq+0x1e0/0x1e0 [sunrpc]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  __rpc_execute+0x6d/0x410 [sunrpc]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  process_one_work+0x1b3/0x350
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  kthread+0x118/0x140
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
>> Jan 29 22:34:05 nfsserver kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>
>> I can try to pick on top of the kernel the change Chuck mentioned to
>> me offlist, which is the posting of
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/1738271066-6727-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx/,
>> and in fact this could be interesting. If the users keep doing the
>> same kind of load, this might help understanding more the issue.
>>
>> As we suspect that the issue is more frequently triggered after the
>> switch of 5.10.118 -> 5.10.221, this enforces more the above, which
>> says it fixes 66af25799940 ("NFSD: add courteous server support for
>> thread with only delegation"), which is in 5.19-rc1, but got
>> backported to 5.15.154 and 5.10.220 as well.
> 
> Unfortunately not. The system ran slightly more stable with that patch on, and
> there was a nfsd hang inbeween here, within a series of 
> 
> [...]
> Feb 02 03:22:40 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 5d31fb84
> Feb 02 03:22:40 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid 9ec25b24
> Feb 02 03:23:09 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid 9fc25b24
> Feb 02 03:23:12 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 5e31fb84
> Feb 02 03:23:24 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid a0c25b24
> Feb 02 03:23:24 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 5f31fb84
> Feb 02 03:23:31 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000fe9013df xid 756103e9
> Feb 02 03:23:31 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000471650a0 xid ef4f583e
> Feb 02 03:23:33 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000008f30d648 xid 1ec77a2e
> Feb 02 03:23:35 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000035c718f5 xid d0b95b44
> Feb 02 03:27:43 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 7d31fb84
> Feb 02 03:27:44 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid bec25b24
> Feb 02 03:27:44 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f83dcedd xid e0be7eef
> Feb 02 03:28:07 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid bfc25b24
> Feb 02 03:28:09 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f83dcedd xid e1be7eef
> Feb 02 03:31:41 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004563c9e7 xid f96ccce2
> Feb 02 03:31:44 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000035c718f5 xid 06ba5b44
> Feb 02 03:31:49 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 9531fb84
> Feb 02 03:31:51 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f83dcedd xid f7be7eef
> Feb 02 03:31:52 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000471650a0 xid 2550583e
> Feb 02 03:31:53 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid d5c25b24
> Feb 02 03:31:53 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000fe9013df xid ab6103e9
> Feb 02 03:31:53 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004111342b xid 9da4f045
> Feb 02 03:32:32 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid d8c25b24
> Feb 02 03:32:32 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f83dcedd xid fabe7eef
> Feb 02 04:18:12 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid a1c35b24
> Feb 02 04:18:12 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000009715512e xid 29a849e3
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000fe9013df xid 786203e9
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000471650a0 xid f150583e
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004563c9e7 xid c66dcce2
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000008f30d648 xid 21c87a2e
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000053af79cb xid 49da29a2
> Feb 02 04:18:13 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 6132fb84
> Feb 02 04:49:18 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000035c718f5 xid 2ebb5b44
> Feb 02 04:49:21 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004563c9e7 xid 226ecce2
> Feb 02 04:49:22 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid fdc35b24
> Feb 02 04:49:22 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f83dcedd xid 1fc07eef
> Feb 02 05:01:25 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid 25c45b24
> Feb 02 05:09:27 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000ca92d20a xid 51c45b24
> [...]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: INFO: task nfsd:1590 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: task:nfsd            state:D stack:    0 pid: 1590 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? rwsem_spin_on_owner+0x74/0xd0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x257/0x4d0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? trace_call_bpf+0x76/0xe0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd4_write+0x1/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x33/0x160 [ext4]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_readv_writev+0x14f/0x1b0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd_vfs_write+0x17f/0x680 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd4_write+0xd0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_dispatch+0x15b/0x250 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process_common+0x3e1/0x6e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_svc+0x390/0x390 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process+0xb7/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd+0x91/0xb0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? get_order+0x20/0x20 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: INFO: task nfsd:1599 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: task:nfsd            state:D stack:    0 pid: 1599 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? rwsem_spin_on_owner+0x74/0xd0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x257/0x4d0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? trace_call_bpf+0x76/0xe0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd4_write+0x1/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x33/0x160 [ext4]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_readv_writev+0x14f/0x1b0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd_vfs_write+0x17f/0x680 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd4_write+0xd0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_dispatch+0x15b/0x250 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process_common+0x3e1/0x6e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_svc+0x390/0x390 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process+0xb7/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd+0x91/0xb0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? get_order+0x20/0x20 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: INFO: task nfsd:1601 blocked for more than 121 seconds.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: task:nfsd            state:D stack:    0 pid: 1601 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  ? rwsem_spin_on_owner+0x74/0xd0
> Feb 02 05:34:46 nfsserver kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x257/0x4d0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? trace_call_bpf+0x76/0xe0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd4_write+0x1/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x33/0x160 [ext4]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_readv_writev+0x14f/0x1b0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd_vfs_write+0x17f/0x680 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd4_write+0xd0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_dispatch+0x15b/0x250 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process_common+0x3e1/0x6e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_svc+0x390/0x390 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process+0xb7/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd+0x91/0xb0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? get_order+0x20/0x20 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: INFO: task nfsd:1604 blocked for more than 121 seconds.
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: task:nfsd            state:D stack:    0 pid: 1604 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? rwsem_spin_on_owner+0x74/0xd0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x257/0x4d0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? trace_call_bpf+0x76/0xe0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd4_write+0x1/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x33/0x160 [ext4]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_readv_writev+0x14f/0x1b0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd_vfs_write+0x17f/0x680 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd4_write+0xd0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_dispatch+0x15b/0x250 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process_common+0x3e1/0x6e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_svc+0x390/0x390 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process+0xb7/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd+0x91/0xb0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? get_order+0x20/0x20 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: INFO: task nfsd:1610 blocked for more than 121 seconds.
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: task:nfsd            state:D stack:    0 pid: 1610 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x257/0x4d0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? trace_call_bpf+0x76/0xe0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd4_write+0x1/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x33/0x160 [ext4]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_readv_writev+0x14f/0x1b0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd_vfs_write+0x17f/0x680 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  nfsd4_write+0xd0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_dispatch+0x15b/0x250 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process_common+0x3e1/0x6e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd_svc+0x390/0x390 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? svc_process+0xb7/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? nfsd+0x91/0xb0 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? get_order+0x20/0x20 [nfsd]
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 05:34:47 nfsserver kernel:  ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is a totally different failure mode: it's hanging in the
ext4 write path. One of your nfsd threads is stuck in D state
waiting to get a rw semaphor.

Question is, who is holding that rw_sem and why?


> This happend a couple of times again and "recovered", but got finally stuck
> again with:
> 
> Feb 02 10:55:25 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000b31acdd9 xid 1639fb84
> Feb 02 10:55:26 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004111342b xid 24acf045
> Feb 02 10:55:27 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 0000000035c718f5 xid 89c15b44
> Feb 02 10:55:28 nfsserver kernel: receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 000000004563c9e7 xid 8c74cce2
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: rcu:         14-....: (5249 ticks this GP) idle=c4e/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=3120573/3120573 fqs=2624 
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:         (t=5250 jiffies g=4585625 q=145785)
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: NMI backtrace for cpu 14
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: CPU: 14 PID: 614435 Comm: kworker/u42:2 Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-34-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.228-1~test1
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: Hardware name: DALCO AG S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: Call Trace:
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  <IRQ>
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  dump_stack+0x6b/0x83
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x32/0x69
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu+0x80/0x80
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xdb/0xf0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa5/0xd7
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x202/0x3d9
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? timekeeping_advance+0x370/0x5c0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  update_process_times+0x8c/0xc0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  tick_sched_handle+0x22/0x60
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  tick_sched_timer+0x65/0x80
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x90/0x90
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x127/0x280
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x2c0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5c/0xe0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  </IRQ>
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: RIP: 0010:mod_delayed_work_on+0x5d/0x90
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: Code: 00 4c 89 e7 e8 34 fe ff ff 89 c3 83 f8 f5 74 e9 85 c0 78 1b 89 ef 4c 89 f1 4c 89 e2 4c 89 ee e8 f9 fc ff ff 48 8b 3c 24 57 9d <0f> 1f 44 00 00 85 db 0f 95 c0 48 8b 4c 24 08 65 48 2b 0c 25 28 00
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffaaff25d57d90 EFLAGS: 00000246
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000003e60000e
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: RDX: 000000003e400000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: RBP: 0000000000002000 R08: ffffffffc08f6430 R09: ffffffffc08f6448
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffffffffc08f6428
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel: R13: ffff8e4083a4b400 R14: 00000000000001f4 R15: 0000000000000000
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  __rpc_sleep_on_priority_timeout+0x111/0x120 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_delay+0x56/0x90 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_exit_task+0x5a/0x140 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? __rpc_do_wake_up_task_on_wq+0x1e0/0x1e0 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  __rpc_execute+0x6d/0x410 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  process_one_work+0x1b3/0x350
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  kthread+0x118/0x140
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> Feb 02 10:55:50 nfsserver kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> 
> Before rebooting the system, rpcdebug -m rpc -c  was issued again, with the
> following logged entry:
> 
> Feb 02 11:01:52 nfsserver kernel: -pid- flgs status -client- --rqstp- -timeout ---ops--
> Feb 02 11:01:52 nfsserver kernel: 42135 2281      0 8ff8d038        0      500  1a6bcc0 nfs4_cbv1 CB_RECALL_ANY a:call_start [sunrpc] q:none

This is also different: the CB_RECALL_ANY is waiting to start, it's not
retransmitting.


> The system is now again back booted with fs.leases-enable=0 to keep it more
> "stable".

Understood, but I don't yet see how this new scenario is related to
NFSv4 delegation. We can speculate, but here's nothing standing out in
the collected data.


-- 
Chuck Lever





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux