Re: warning in nfsd4_cb_done

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Lever writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla:

(In reply to Bugspray Bot from comment #3)
> Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> replies to comment #1:
> 
> > First issue is the explicit use of NFS4ERR_BAD_XDR in the CB_GETATTR reply
> > decoder. Should be EIO instead.
> >
> > Second issue is the CB_GETATTR reply decoder does not seem capable of
> > handling a non-zero status code in the reply.
> >
> > Third issue is whether NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE means the server requested a
> > CB_GETATTR for the wrong file, or if it is an expected situation.
> 
> Isn't this because 6.12.x is still missing the patch "NFSD: fix
> decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr" that just went into 6.14?

Yes, second and third issues are addressed by 1b3e26a5ccbf ("NFSD: fix decoding in nfs4_xdr_dec_cb_getattr").

The first issue has not yet been addressed upstream.

View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219737#c4
You can reply to this message to join the discussion.
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux