On 01/15/2010 01:59 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> On 01/15/2010 01:27 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> On 01/15/2010 12:49 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>> These patches provide IPv6 support for the tcpwrapper shim inside >>>>> nfs-utils. It assumes that the generic tcpwrapper library can >>>>> support IPv6 addresses. It has not been extensively tested, but >>>>> I think the framework is reasonable, and only minor bug fixes might >>>>> be needed as we go along. >>>> Did you do any simple "hello world" testing? >>> >>> I've build-tested them. Jeff and I had them applied while doing the >>> statd testing. They don't appear to cause problems when no allow/deny >>> sets exist. >>> >>> I thought we would have more time to test and review these, so I haven't >>> done more extensive testing so far. In any case, I don't think they >>> will be harmful, and can serve as a place marker for that feature as the >>> beta moves forward. >> Unfortunately I have broken these before and it was awful painful... :-( >> Right or wrong... there is still a large number of people that depend >> on this archaic routines... we need to be very careful... > > Do you have tests I can run to validate these patches to your satisfaction? No... I wish I did... I just do the testing by hand... steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
