Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] nfsd/sunrpc: cleanup resource with sync mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2024-12-25 at 14:59 +0800, Yang Erkun wrote:
> After f8c989a0c89a ("nfsd: release svc_expkey/svc_export with
> rcu_work"), svc_export_put/expkey_put will call path_put with async
> mode. This can lead some unexpected failure:
> 
> mkdir /mnt/sda
> mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda
> echo "/ *(rw,no_root_squash,fsid=0)" > /etc/exports
> echo "/mnt *(rw,no_root_squash,fsid=1)" >> /etc/exports
> exportfs -ra
> service nfs-server start
> mount -t nfs -o vers=4.0 127.0.0.1:/mnt /mnt1
> mount /dev/sda /mnt/sda
> touch /mnt1/sda/file
> exportfs -r
> umount /mnt/sda # failed unexcepted
> 
> The touch above will finally call nfsd_cross_mnt, add refcount to mount,
> and then add cache_head. Before this commit, exportfs -r will call
> cache_flush to cleanup all cache_head, and path_put in
> svc_export_put/expkey_put will be finished with sync mode. So, the
> latter umount will always success. However, after this commit, path_put
> will be called with async mode, the latter umount may failed, and if we
> add some delay, umount will success too. Personally I think this bug and
> should be fixed. We first revert before bugfix patch, and then fix the
> original bug with a different way.
> 
> v1->v2:
> 
> 1. do not change cache_check, instead add cache_check_rcu and use it in
> c_show/e_show
> 2. the first patch has been applied
> 
> Yang Erkun (4):
>   SUNRPC: introduce cache_check_rcu to help check in rcu context
>   nfsd: no need get cache ref when protected by rcu
>   SUNRPC: no need get cache ref when protected by rcu
>   nfsd: fix UAF when access ex_uuid or ex_stats
> 
>  fs/nfsd/export.c             | 25 ++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h |  2 ++
>  net/sunrpc/cache.c           | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 

A much nicer fix. My only minor nit is that it might be nice to add a
kerneldoc header over cache_check_rcu, so that it's clear that it
doesn't touch the cache_head refcount like cache_check does.

Either way, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux