On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 10:42 -0500, cel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > > SCSI implementation experience has shown that an interrupt-only > COPY offload implementation is not reliable. There are too many > common scenarios where the client can miss the completion interrupt > (in our case, this is a CB_OFFLOAD callback). > > Therefore, a polling mechanism is needed. The NFSv4.2 protocol > provides one in the form of the new OFFLOAD_STATUS operation. Linux > NFSD implements OFFLOAD_STATUS already. This series adds a Linux NFS > client implementation of the OFFLOAD_STATUS operation that can query > the state of a background COPY on the server. > > These patches are also available here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/log/?h=fix-async-copy > > Changes since v1: > - nfs42_proc_offload_status() now uses a synchronous RPC > > Chuck Lever (7): > NFS: CB_OFFLOAD can return NFS4ERR_DELAY > NFS: Fix typo in OFFLOAD_CANCEL comment > NFS: Rename struct nfs4_offloadcancel_data > NFS: Implement NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS XDR > NFS: Implement NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS operation > NFS: Use NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS operation > NFS: Refactor trace_nfs4_offload_cancel > > fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 2 +- > fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > fs/nfs/nfs42xdr.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++- > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 +- > fs/nfs/nfs4trace.h | 11 ++- > fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 1 + > include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 + > include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 + > include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 5 +- > 9 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > Nice work, Chuck. This all looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>