Re: [for-6.13 PATCH v3 00/14] nfs/nfsd: improvements for LOCALIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:55:16PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/18/24 12:31 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 09:31:23PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:26:39PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 20:40 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> All available here:
> >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/log/?h=nfs-localio-for-next
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since v2:
> >>>> - switched from rcu_assign_pointer to RCU_INIT_POINTER when setting to
> >>>>   NULL.
> >>>> - removed some unnecessary #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_LOCALIO)
> >>>> - revised the NFS v3 probe patch to use a new nfsv3.ko modparam
> >>>>   'nfs3_localio_probe_throttle' to control if NFSv3 will probe for
> >>>>   LOCALIO. Avoids use of NFS_CS_LOCAL_IO and will probe every
> >>>>   'nfs3_localio_probe_throttle' IO requests (defaults to 0, disabled).
> >>>> - added "Module Parameters" section to localio.rst
> >>>>
> >>>> All review appreciated, thanks.
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike Snitzer (14):
> >>>>   nfs/localio: add direct IO enablement with sync and async IO support
> >>>>   nfsd: add nfsd_file_{get,put} to 'nfs_to' nfsd_localio_operations
> >>>>   nfs_common: rename functions that invalidate LOCALIO nfs_clients
> >>>>   nfs_common: move localio_lock to new lock member of nfs_uuid_t
> >>>>   nfs: cache all open LOCALIO nfsd_file(s) in client
> >>>>   nfsd: update percpu_ref to manage references on nfsd_net
> >>>>   nfsd: rename nfsd_serv_ prefixed methods and variables with nfsd_net_
> >>>>   nfsd: nfsd_file_acquire_local no longer returns GC'd nfsd_file
> >>>>   nfs_common: rename nfslocalio nfs_uuid_lock to nfs_uuids_lock
> >>>>   nfs_common: track all open nfsd_files per LOCALIO nfs_client
> >>>>   nfs_common: add nfs_localio trace events
> >>>>   nfs/localio: remove redundant code and simplify LOCALIO enablement
> >>>>   nfs: probe for LOCALIO when v4 client reconnects to server
> >>>>   nfs: probe for LOCALIO when v3 client reconnects to server
> >>>>
> >>>>  Documentation/filesystems/nfs/localio.rst |  98 +++++----
> >>>>  fs/nfs/client.c                           |   6 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfs/direct.c                           |   1 +
> >>>>  fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c    |  25 +--
> >>>>  fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.h    |   1 +
> >>>>  fs/nfs/inode.c                            |   3 +
> >>>>  fs/nfs/internal.h                         |   9 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfs/localio.c                          | 232 +++++++++++++++-----
> >>>>  fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c                         |  46 +++-
> >>>>  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c                        |   1 +
> >>>>  fs/nfs/nfstrace.h                         |  32 ---
> >>>>  fs/nfs/pagelist.c                         |   5 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfs/write.c                            |   3 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfs_common/Makefile                    |   3 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfs_common/localio_trace.c             |  10 +
> >>>>  fs/nfs_common/localio_trace.h             |  56 +++++
> >>>>  fs/nfs_common/nfslocalio.c                | 250 +++++++++++++++++-----
> >>>>  fs/nfsd/filecache.c                       |  20 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfsd/localio.c                         |   9 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfsd/netns.h                           |  12 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c                          |   6 +-
> >>>>  fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c                          |  40 ++--
> >>>>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h                    |  22 +-
> >>>>  include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h                 |   3 +-
> >>>>  include/linux/nfs_xdr.h                   |   1 +
> >>>>  include/linux/nfslocalio.h                |  48 +++--
> >>>>  26 files changed, 674 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-)
> >>>>  create mode 100644 fs/nfs_common/localio_trace.c
> >>>>  create mode 100644 fs/nfs_common/localio_trace.h
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I went through the set and it looks mostly sane to me. The one concern
> >>> I have is that you have the client set up to start caching nfsd files
> >>> before there is a mechanism to call it and ask them to return them. You
> >>> might see some weird behavior there on a bisect, but it looks like it
> >>> all gets resolved in the end.
> >>
> >> Yeah, couldn't see a better way to atomically pivot to the new disable
> >> functionality without it needing to be a large muddled patch.
> >>
> >> Shouldn't be bad even if someone did bisect, its only the server being
> >> restarted during LOCALIO that could see issues (unlikely thing for
> >> someone to be testing for specifically with a bisect).
> >>
> >>> How do you intend for this to go in? Since most of this is client side,
> >>> will this be going in via Trond/Anna's tree?
> >>
> >> Yes, likely easiest to have it go through Trond/Anna's tree.  Trond
> >> did have it in his testing tree, maybe your Reviewed-by helps it all
> >> land.
> >>
> >>> You can add:
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >>
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > These LOCALIO changes didn't land for 6.13 merge, please advise on if
> > we might get these changes staged for 6.14 now-ish.
> 
> Works for me.
> 
> > 
> > Trond and/or Anna, do you feel comfortable picking this series up
> > (nfsd cachnges too) or would you like to see any changes before that
> > is possible?
> 
> I'll go through the patches once more, but they should be fine. I will need Acked-by's for the NFSD bits from Chuck or Jeff.

OK, Jeff did already provide his Reviewed-by for the entire set (still
visible in the exchange I quoted above).

Thanks,
Mike




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux