On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 03:56:08PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, Daire Byrne wrote: > > Neil, > > > > I'm curious if this work relates to: > > > > https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375 > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPt2mGMZh9=Vwcqjh0J4XoTu3stOnKwswdzApL4wCA_usOFV_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Yes, it could possibly help with that - though more work would be > needed. > nfsd currently has a hard limit of 160 slots per session. That wouldn't > be enough I suspect. The Linux client has a hard limit of 1024. That > might be enough. > Allowed nfsd to have 1024 (or more) shouldn't be too hard... 1024 could be in the range where having a shrinker (when there are multiple clients with that many slots) will start to bring some value. Maybe 1024 is too large at the beginning of a session, but enabling NFSD to grow a session to that size would not be a bad thing. -- Chuck Lever