Re: [PATCH 1/6] VFS: Ensure that writeback_single_inode() commits unstable writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:38 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: 
> On Wed 06-01-10 15:51:10, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 9147ca8..ea0b7a3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -1635,6 +1637,8 @@ struct super_operations {
> >  #define I_CLEAR			64
> >  #define __I_SYNC		7
> >  #define I_SYNC			(1 << __I_SYNC)
> > +#define __I_UNSTABLE_PAGES	9
>   Hum, why isn't this 8?
> 
> 							Honza

I missed Christoph's patch that got rid of I_LOCK. I think that was
merged after I started work on these patches.

I'd be quite OK with changing the above value to 8 if that is
preferable.

Cheers
  Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux