Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfsd: fix race between laundromat and free_stateid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:14 AM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 09:04 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 18:18 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > There is a race between laundromat handling of revoked delegations
> > > and a client sending free_stateid operation. Laundromat thread
> > > finds that delegation has expired and needs to be revoked so it
> > > marks the delegation stid revoked and it puts it on a reaper list
> > > but then it unlock the state lock and the actual delegation
> > > revocation
> > > happens without the lock. Once the stid is marked revoked a racing
> > > free_stateid processing thread does the following (1) it calls
> > > list_del_init() which removes it from the reaper list and (2) frees
> > > the delegation stid structure. The laundromat thread ends up not
> > > calling the revoke_delegation() function for this particular
> > > delegation
> > > but that means it will no release the lock lease that exists on
> > > the file.
> > >
> > > Now, a new open for this file comes in and ends up finding that
> > > lease list isn't empty and calls nfsd_breaker_owns_lease() which
> > > ends
> > > up trying to derefence a freed delegation stateid. Leading to the
> > > followint use-after-free KASAN warning:
> > >
> > > kernel:
> > > ==================================================================
> > > kernel: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
> > > nfsd_breaker_owns_lease+0x140/0x160 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: Read of size 8 at addr ffff0000e73cd0c8 by task nfsd/6205
> > > kernel:
> > > kernel: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 6205 Comm: nfsd Kdump: loaded Not
> > > tainted 6.11.0-rc7+ #9
> > > kernel: Hardware name: Apple Inc. Apple Virtualization Generic
> > > Platform, BIOS 2069.0.0.0.0 08/03/2024
> > > kernel: Call trace:
> > > kernel: dump_backtrace+0x98/0x120
> > > kernel: show_stack+0x1c/0x30
> > > kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xe8
> > > kernel: print_address_description.constprop.0+0x84/0x390
> > > kernel: print_report+0xa4/0x268
> > > kernel: kasan_report+0xb4/0xf8
> > > kernel: __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x1c/0x28
> > > kernel: nfsd_breaker_owns_lease+0x140/0x160 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: leases_conflict+0x68/0x370
> > > kernel: __break_lease+0x204/0xc38
> > > kernel: nfsd_open_break_lease+0x8c/0xf0 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd_file_do_acquire+0xb3c/0x11d0 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd_file_acquire_opened+0x84/0x110 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x634/0x958 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd4_process_open2+0xa40/0x1a40 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd4_open+0xa08/0xe80 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd4_proc_compound+0xb8c/0x2130 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: nfsd_dispatch+0x22c/0x718 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: svc_process_common+0x8e8/0x1960 [sunrpc]
> > > kernel: svc_process+0x3d4/0x7e0 [sunrpc]
> > > kernel: svc_handle_xprt+0x828/0xe10 [sunrpc]
> > > kernel: svc_recv+0x2cc/0x6a8 [sunrpc]
> > > kernel: nfsd+0x270/0x400 [nfsd]
> > > kernel: kthread+0x288/0x310
> > > kernel: ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > >
> > > Proposing to have laundromat thread hold the state_lock over both
> > > marking thru revoking the delegation as well as making free_stateid
> > > acquire state_lock before accessing the list. Making sure that
> > > revoke_delegation() (ie kernel_setlease(unlock)) is called for
> > > every delegation that was revoked and added to the reaper list.
> > >
> >
> > Nice detective work!
> >
> > > CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > --- I can't figure out the Fixes: tag. Laundromat's behaviour has
> > > been like that forever. But the free_stateid bits wont apply before
> > > the 1e3577a4521e ("SUNRPC: discard sv_refcnt, and
> > > svc_get/svc_put").
> > > But we used that fixes tag already with a previous fix for a
> > > different
> > > problem.
> > > ---
> > >  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > index 9c2b1d251ab3..c97907d7fb38 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > @@ -6605,13 +6605,13 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > >             unhash_delegation_locked(dp, SC_STATUS_REVOKED);
> > >             list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > >     }
> > > -   spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > >     while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > >             dp = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct
> > > nfs4_delegation,
> > >                                     dl_recall_lru);
> > >             list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > >             revoke_delegation(dp);
> > >     }
> > > +   spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > >
> > >     spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> > >     while (!list_empty(&nn->close_lru)) {
> > > @@ -7213,7 +7213,9 @@ nfsd4_free_stateid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> > > struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > >             if (s->sc_status & SC_STATUS_REVOKED) {
> > >                     spin_unlock(&s->sc_lock);
> > >                     dp = delegstateid(s);
> > > +                   spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > >                     list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > > +                   spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > >                     spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
>
> nfs4_set_delegation() takes these locks in the opposite order, so as it
> stands, this patch introduces a potential ABBA deadlock.
> I suggest moving the state_lock so that it is taken before and released
> after the cl->cl_lock.

I understand the comment about the deadlock and the need but I would
like to make sure if I understand the direction. Are you saying that
the state_lock should be taken in the beginning of the
nfsd4_free_stated() before we take the client lock?

>
>
> > >                     nfs4_put_stid(s);
> > >                     ret = nfs_ok;
> >
> >
> > I'm not thrilled with this patch, but it does seem like it would fix
> > the problem. Long term, I think we need to get rid of the state_lock,
> > but I don't have a real plan for that just yet as it's not 100% clear
> > what it still protects.
> >
> > As far as a Fixes tag, this bug is likely very old. I'd say it
> > probably
> > got introduced here:
> >
> >     2d4a532d385f nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected
> > by clp->cl_lock
> >
> > In any case, let's go with this patch until we can come up with a
> > better plan for delegation handling.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> --
> Trond Myklebust
> Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux