Re: (subset) [PATCH -next v3 1/3] lib/string_choices: Add str_true_false()/str_false_true() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:25:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:49:51 +0800 Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Anything which is calling these functions is not performance-sensitive,
> > > so optimizing for space is preferred.  An out-of-line function which
> > > returns a const char * will achieve this?
> > I think this helper can achieve this. Because it is tiny enough, the
> > compiler will handle this like #define macro (do the replacement)
> > without allocating extra functional stack. On the contrary, if it is
> > implemented as a non-inline function, it will cause extra functional
> > stack when it was called every time. And it also should be implemented
> > in a source file (.c file), not in header file(.h file).
> 
> [...]

Since I've taken over string maintainership, I've applied this to my
tree (where other similar changes are appearing). This should reduce
conflicts here...

Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!

[1/3] lib/string_choices: Add str_true_false()/str_false_true() helper
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/6ff4cd1160af

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux