On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:44 AM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:14:01AM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > > states_show() relied on sc_type field to be of valid type > > before calling into a subfunction to show content of a > > particular stateid. But from commit 3f29cc82a84c we > > split the validity of the stateid into sc_status and no longer > > changed sc_type to 0 while unhashing the stateid. This > > resulted in kernel oopsing as something like > > nfs4_show_open() would derefence sc_file which was NULL. > > > > To reproduce: mount the server with 4.0, read and close > > a file and then on the server cat /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/2/states > > > > [ 513.590804] Call trace: > > [ 513.590925] _raw_spin_lock+0xcc/0x160 > > [ 513.591119] nfs4_show_open+0x78/0x2c0 [nfsd] > > [ 513.591412] states_show+0x44c/0x488 [nfsd] > > [ 513.591681] seq_read_iter+0x5d8/0x760 > > [ 513.591896] seq_read+0x188/0x208 > > [ 513.592075] vfs_read+0x148/0x470 > > [ 513.592241] ksys_read+0xcc/0x178 > > > > Fixes: 3f29cc82a84c ("nfsd: split sc_status out of sc_type") > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > > index c3def49074a4..8351724b8a43 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > > @@ -2907,6 +2907,9 @@ static int states_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) > > { > > struct nfs4_stid *st = v; > > > > + if (!st->sc_file) > > + return 0; > > + > > switch (st->sc_type) { > > case SC_TYPE_OPEN: > > return nfs4_show_open(s, st); > > -- > > 2.43.5 > > > > I'll wait for Neil/Jeff's Reviewed-by, but the root cause analysis > seems plausible to me, and I'll plan to apply it for v6.11-rc. > > Btw, I noticed this at the tail of states_show(): > > /* XXX: copy stateids? */ > > I'm not really sure, but those won't ever have an sc_file, will > they? Are COPY callback stateids something we want the server to > display in this code? Just musing aloud: maybe the NULL sc_file > check wants to be moved into the show helpers. I can see that the copy stateids still have type NFS4_COPY_STID so they are not converted to the new type of SC_TYPE. But it just means we are not displaying them. I'm not sure what happens to sc_file for copy stateid, I'd need to check. > > -- > Chuck Lever >