Re: Problem with 2.6.33-rc1 and insecure flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:46:26AM +0100, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> I think I figured out the problem. 
> 
> Apparently the code checked if insecure was set, while it should check if it was NOT set.

Thanks!  And apologies, I ran across this too a couple days ago, left it
in -next, and forgot to send it upstream....  I'll do that now.

--b.

> 
> Kind regards,
> Michael
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> index 1c12177..55c8e63 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>         int flags = nfsexp_flags(rqstp, exp);
>  
>         /* Check if the request originated from a secure port. */
> -       if (!rqstp->rq_secure && (flags & NFSEXP_INSECURE_PORT)) {
> +       if (!rqstp->rq_secure && !(flags & NFSEXP_INSECURE_PORT)) {
>                 RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]);
>                 dprintk(KERN_WARNING
>                        "nfsd: request from insecure port %s!\n",
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux