On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:20:11 -0500 Steve Rago <sar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't disagree, but "that's not what we do" hardly provides insight > into making the judgment call. In this case, the variety of > combinations of NFS server speed, NFS client speed, transmission link > speed, client memory size, and server memory size argues for a tunable > parameter, because one value probably won't work well in all > combinations. Making it change dynamically based on these parameters > is more complicated than these circumstances call for, IMHO. if you as the expert do not know how to tune this... how is a sysadmin supposed to know better? -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
