On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > > On Jul 15, 2024, at 3:14 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This patch set (against nfsd-next) enables automatic adjustment of the > > number of nfsd threads. The number can increase under high load, and > > reduce after idle periods. > > > > The first few patches (1-6) are cleanups that may not be entirely > > relevant to the current series. They could safely land any time and > > only need minimal review. > > I'm trying to get moving on this series. So, I've reviewed 1-6, > with one minor comment (posted previously). If you plan to > repost 5/14, let me know, or you can send me a set of edits for > its patch description and I can apply what's already been posted > to nfsd-next now. I do have plans - for code comments as well as commit comments. I'll try to send something on Friday. > > I stopped at 7/14 because we should resolve whether to continue > adding NOFAIL in new code. My impression, from attending the > various LSF sessions on this topic, was that community consensus > is "NOFAIL is NO BUENO". If we feel the community discussion is > ongoing rather than concluded, then we'll have to sort this out > ourselves. I will post that NOFAIL patch more broadly - including fs-devel and linux-mm and see if any consensus emerges. Thanks, NeilBrown > > > -- > Chuck Lever > > >
