On Sat, 06 Jul 2024, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 02:59:31PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 2024, at 10:36 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 07:18:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 10:15:46AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > >>> NFSv3 is needed because NFSv3 is used to initiate IO to NFSv3 knfsd on > > >>> the same host. > > >> > > >> That doesn't really bring is any further. Why is it required? > > >> > > >> I think we'll just need to stop this discussion until we have reasonable > > >> documentation of the use cases and assumptions, because without that > > >> we'll get hund up in dead loops. > > > > > > It _really_ isn't material to the core capability that localio provides. > > > localio supporting NFSv3 is beneficial for NFSv3 users (NFSv3 in > > > containers). > > > > > > Hammerspace needs localio to work with NFSv3 to assist with its "data > > > movers" that run on the host (using nfs and nfsd). > > > > > > Please just remove yourself from the conversation if you cannot make > > > sense of this. If you'd like to be involved, put the work in to > > > understand the code and be professional. > > > > Sorry, I can't make sense of this either, and I find the > > personal attack here completely inappropriate (and a bit > > hypocritical, to be honest). > > Hi Chuck, > > I'm out-gunned with this good-cop/bad-cop dynamic. I was replying to > Christoph. Who has taken to feign incapable of understanding localio > yet is perfectly OK with flexing like he is an authority on the topic. Ad Hominem doesn't achieve anything useful. Please stick with technical arguments. (They are the only ones I understand). NeilBrown
