On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:04:56PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:06:09PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > To make it official, for v11 of this series: > > > > Nacked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We've also not even looked into tackling the whole memory reclaim > recursion problem that have historically made local loopback > network file system an unsupported configuration. We've have an > ongoing discussion on the XFS list that really needs to to fsdevel > and mm to make any progress first. I see absolutely not chance to > solved that in this merge window. I'm also a bit surprised and > shocked by the rush here. linux-nfs and linu-xfs both received those emails, there isn't some secret game here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171976530216518&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=171976530416523&w=2 I pivoted away from that (after Dave's helpful response) and back to what I provided in most every revision of this patchset (with different header and code revisions), most recent being patch 18 of this v11 series: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171993773109538&w=2 And if spending the past 2 months discussing and developing in the open is rushing things, I clearly need to slow down... If only I had reason to think others were considering merging these changes: https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=171942776105165&w=2 Ultimately I simply wanted to keep momentum up, I'm sure you can relate to having a vision for phasing changes in without missing a cycle. But happy to just continue working it into the 6.12 development window. I'll be sure to cc linux-fsdevel on future revision(s).
