Re: knfsd performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Jun 18, 2024, at 2:32 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I recently back ported Neil's lwq code and sunrpc server changes to our
> 5.15.130 based kernel in the hope of improving the performance for our
> data servers.
> 
> Our performance team recently ran a fio workload on a client that was
> doing 100% NFSv3 reads in O_DIRECT mode over an RDMA connection
> (infiniband) against that resulting server. I've attached the resulting
> flame graph from a perf profile run on the server side.
> 
> Is anyone else seeing this massive contention for the spin lock in
> __lwq_dequeue? As you can see, it appears to be dwarfing all the other
> nfsd activity on the system in question here, being responsible for 45%
> of all the perf hits.

I haven't seen that, but I've been working on other issues.

What's the nfsd thread count on your test server? Have you
seen a similar impact on 6.10 kernels ?

--
Chuck Lever






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux