On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:51 -0800, Labiaga, Ricardo wrote: > On 12/7/09 6:47 AM, "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Looking at the code, I'm not convinced that we need a separate > > 'RECLAIM_COMPLETE_PENDING' state. It should be pretty much identical to > > the existing NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_REBOOT state. > > The only difference is that in the NFSv4.1 case we want to be able to > > call RECLAIM_COMPLETE even in the case where we have no state to > > reclaim. > > > > Yes, this would be the case if my interpretation of the spec is incorrect. I don't see how your interpretation changes anything w.r.t the question of whether we need a new state or not. You can still set NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_REBOOT and get it to do the right thing... Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
