Re: Bad NFS performance for fsync(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 18:55, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've been debugging NFS performance regression with recent kernels. It
> seems to be at least partially related to the following behavior of NFS
> (which is there for a long time AFAICT). Suppose the following workload:
>
> fio --direct=0 --ioengine=sync --thread --directory=/test --invalidate=1 \
>   --group_reporting=1 --runtime=100 --fallocate=posix --ramp_time=10 \
>   --name=RandomWrites-async --new_group --rw=randwrite --size=32000m \
>   --numjobs=4 --bs=4k --fsync_on_close=1 --end_fsync=1 \
>   --filename_format='FioWorkloads.$jobnum'

Where do you get the fio command from?

Dan
-- 
Dan Shelton - Cluster Specialist Win/Lin/Bsd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux