Re: [PATCH 1/1] pNFS/filelayout: fixup pNfs allocation modes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:25 AM Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7 May 2024, at 11:15, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>
> > From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Change left over allocation flags.
> >
> > Fixes: a245832aaa99 ("pNFS/files: Ensure pNFS allocation modes are consistent with nfsiod")
> > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> > index cc2ed4b5a4fd..85d2dc9bc212 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c
> > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ filelayout_pg_init_read(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
> >                                                     req->wb_bytes,
> >                                                     IOMODE_READ,
> >                                                     false,
> > -                                                   GFP_KERNEL);
> > +                                                   nfs_io_gfp_mask());
> >               if (IS_ERR(pgio->pg_lseg)) {
> >                       pgio->pg_error = PTR_ERR(pgio->pg_lseg);
> >                       pgio->pg_lseg = NULL;
> > @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ filelayout_pg_init_write(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
> >                                                     req->wb_bytes,
> >                                                     IOMODE_RW,
> >                                                     false,
> > -                                                   GFP_NOFS);
> > +                                                   nfs_io_gfp_mask());
> >               if (IS_ERR(pgio->pg_lseg)) {
> >                       pgio->pg_error = PTR_ERR(pgio->pg_lseg);
> >                       pgio->pg_lseg = NULL;
> > --
> > 2.39.1
>
> Looks fine, but I didn't think you could get here from rpciod/nfsiod
> context.  I might be missing something, how did you get here from there?

I have to admit I don't fully understand (if at all) the implications
of having the wrong flags. I also don't follow what you mean by this
code not being executed by the rpciod/nfsiod context. This code is
done while doing (buffered) IO and performed by the rpciod context?

In truth I was making it consistent with what flexfiles is doing for
their pnfs_update_layout() usage.

>
> Ben
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux