On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:00:44AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 07:28:58PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 6, 2024, at 3:15 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Chuck, hi Steve, > > > > > > In Debian, as you might have heard there is a 64bit time_t > > > transition[1] ongoing affecting the armel and armhf architectures. > > > While doing so, nfs-utils was found to fail to build for those > > > architectures after the switch, reported in Debian as [2]. Vladimir > > > Petko from Ubuntu has as well filled it in [3]. > > > > > > [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg00005.html > > > [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/1067829 > > > [3]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218540 > > > > > > The report is full-quoted below. > > > > > > Vladimir Petko has created a patch in the bugzilla which I'm attaching > > > here as well. If this is not an acceptable format due to missing > > > Signed-off's I'm attaching a variant with a Suggested-by for Vladimir > > > to properly credit the patch origin. > > > > > > Let me know if that works. I changed it slightly and only casting to > > > long long, and made it almost checkpatch clean. > > > > I suppose strftime(3) might be nicer, but this works. > > > > Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I noticed this is not yet applied to the repository, do you need > anything else from me or did it just felt trouch the cracks or > actually queued? > > Asking since if you want to have it done differently I will then > follow suit downstream as well in Debian, where we have for now > applied the submitted patch. Salvatore, can you resend the patch inline (not as an attachment) To: Steve, Cc: linux-nfs@ ? Steve, see above for my Reviewed-by. -- Chuck Lever
