Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Remove comment for sp_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> It is obsolete since sp_lock was discarded in commit 580a25756a9f
> ("SUNRPC: discard sp_lock").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index b4a85a227bd7..ec78c277a02e 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(svc_xprt_class_list);
>  
>  /* SMP locking strategy:
>   *
> - *	svc_pool->sp_lock protects most of the fields of that pool.
>   *	svc_serv->sv_lock protects sv_tempsocks, sv_permsocks, sv_tmpcnt.
>   *	when both need to be taken (rare), svc_serv->sv_lock is first.
>   *	The "service mutex" protects svc_serv->sv_nrthread.


I usually make an effort to find those sorts of things but I obviously
missed it this time.
Thanks.

Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux