On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Nico Pache wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:51 AM Scott Mayhew <smayhew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 07 Mar 2024, Nico Pache wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > One of the RFC 6803 key derivation kunit subtests is failing. > > > > > > cki-project data warehouse : https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/issue/2514 > > > > > > Arches: X86_64, ARM64, S390x, ppc64le > > > First Appeared: ~6.8.rc2 > > > > > > TRACE: > > > # Subtest: RFC 6803 key derivation > > > # RFC 6803 key derivation: ASSERTION FAILED at net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_test.c:63 > > > Expected err == 0, but > > > err == -110 (0xffffffffffffff92) > > > not ok 1 Derive Kc subkey for camellia128-cts-cmac > > > ok 2 Derive Ke subkey for camellia128-cts-cmac > > > ok 3 Derive Ki subkey for camellia128-cts-cmac > > > ok 4 Derive Kc subkey for camellia256-cts-cmac > > > ok 5 Derive Ke subkey for camellia256-cts-cmac > > > ok 6 Derive Ki subkey for camellia256-cts-cmac > > > # RFC 6803 key derivation: pass:5 fail:1 skip:0 total:6 > > > not ok 1 RFC 6803 key derivation > > > > This was broken by: > > c72a870926c2 kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs > > > > __kunit_test_suites_init() runs any time a kernel module is loaded, via > > the "kunit_mod_nb" notifier_block... even if the kernel module has no > > kunit tests. But now __kunit_test_suites_init() also locks a mutex, > > which is a problem if a kunit test itself needs to load a kernel module > > (which the gss_krb5_test module does). > > > > This fixes it for me: > > > > ---8<--- > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c > > index 088489856db8..18af9453632b 100644 > > --- a/lib/kunit/test.c > > +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c > > @@ -707,6 +707,9 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_ > > { > > unsigned int i; > > > > + if (num_suites == 0) > > + return 0; > > + > > if (!kunit_enabled() && num_suites > 0) { > > pr_info("kunit: disabled\n"); > > return 0; > > ---8<--- > > > Nice find! Would you mind posting a patch? Yes - while testing I also found an issue with the RFC 8009 encryption test and I wanted to be sure it wasn't related to this issue before posting the patch. -Scott > > -- Nico > > > More detail below: > > > > Here's the modprobe command where I loaded the gss_krb5_test module. This > > process has the "kunit_run_lock" mutex locked: > > > > PID: 1468 TASK: ffff9aed0ac20000 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "modprobe" > > #0 [ffffba974196f6f8] __schedule at ffffffff83fd85f5 > > #1 [ffffba974196f7b0] schedule at ffffffff83fd9672 > > #2 [ffffba974196f7c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff83fe0308 > > #3 [ffffba974196f818] wait_for_completion_timeout at ffffffff83fda3d4 > > #4 [ffffba974196f878] kunit_try_catch_run at ffffffffc0d5e851 [kunit] > > #5 [ffffba974196f8c8] kunit_run_tests at ffffffffc0d5c0ea [kunit] > > #6 [ffffba974196fb78] __kunit_test_suites_init at ffffffffc0d5c9af [kunit] > > #7 [ffffba974196fb98] kunit_module_notify at ffffffffc0d5ba4b [kunit] > > #8 [ffffba974196fc08] notifier_call_chain at ffffffff8314647a > > #9 [ffffba974196fc40] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust at ffffffff83146565 > > #10 [ffffba974196fc88] load_module at ffffffff831e1935 > > #11 [ffffba974196fde8] __do_sys_init_module at ffffffff831e1fba > > #12 [ffffba974196fec0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff83fc3461 > > #13 [ffffba974196fee8] do_user_addr_fault at ffffffff830979df > > #14 [ffffba974196ff28] exc_page_fault at ffffffff83fc9c7f > > #15 [ffffba974196ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff840000ea > > RIP: 00007ff1f272b4ae RSP: 00007ffd45db8f68 RFLAGS: 00000246 > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055bf4c0c4b20 RCX: 00007ff1f272b4ae > > RDX: 000055bf4b204e79 RSI: 0000000000099691 RDI: 000055bf4cbfd130 > > RBP: 00007ffd45db9020 R8: 000055bf4c0c4010 R9: 0000000000000007 > > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055bf4b204e79 > > R13: 0000000000040000 R14: 000055bf4c0c4c50 R15: 000055bf4c0c4390 > > ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af CS: 0033 SS: 002b > > > > Here's the kunit test case running. It's trying to allocate "cmac(camellia)" > > via crypto_alloc_shash(): > > > > PID: 1508 TASK: ffff9aed155d0000 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "kunit_try_catch" > > #0 [ffffba974194fba0] __schedule at ffffffff83fd85f5 > > #1 [ffffba974194fc58] schedule at ffffffff83fd9672 > > #2 [ffffba974194fc70] schedule_timeout at ffffffff83fe0308 > > #3 [ffffba974194fcc0] wait_for_completion_killable_timeout at ffffffff83fda708 > > #4 [ffffba974194fd20] crypto_larval_wait at ffffffff83747fb4 > > #5 [ffffba974194fd38] crypto_alg_mod_lookup at ffffffff83748252 > > #6 [ffffba974194fd70] crypto_alloc_tfm_node at ffffffff83748492 > > #7 [ffffba974194fdb0] krb5_kdf_feedback_cmac at ffffffffc0d76bb2 [rpcsec_gss_krb5] > > #8 [ffffba974194fe30] kdf_case at ffffffffc0d800a8 [gss_krb5_test] > > #9 [ffffba974194fe80] kunit_try_run_case at ffffffffc0d5bb54 [kunit] > > #10 [ffffba974194fee8] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter at ffffffffc0d5e797 [kunit] > > #11 [ffffba974194fef8] kthread at ffffffff8313eda5 > > #12 [ffffba974194ff30] ret_from_fork at ffffffff830414a1 > > #13 [ffffba974194ff50] ret_from_fork_asm at ffffffff830039ab > > > > Here the crypto manager is trying to modprobe the camellia kernel module via a > > usermodehelper call: > > > > PID: 1511 TASK: ffff9aed04630000 CPU: 3 COMMAND: "cryptomgr_probe" > > #0 [ffffba974195fb88] __schedule at ffffffff83fd85f5 > > #1 [ffffba974195fc40] schedule at ffffffff83fd9672 > > #2 [ffffba974195fc58] schedule_timeout at ffffffff83fe03c1 > > #3 [ffffba974195fca8] wait_for_completion_state at ffffffff83fdb06d > > #4 [ffffba974195fd18] call_usermodehelper_exec at ffffffff83130313 > > #5 [ffffba974195fd68] __request_module at ffffffff831e325d > > #6 [ffffba974195fe28] crypto_alg_mod_lookup at ffffffff83748220 > > #7 [ffffba974195fe60] crypto_grab_spawn at ffffffff83749ff7 > > #8 [ffffba974195fe98] cmac_create at ffffffff8375c2f0 > > #9 [ffffba974195fed8] cryptomgr_probe at ffffffff83754a93 > > #10 [ffffba974195fef8] kthread at ffffffff8313eda5 > > #11 [ffffba974195ff30] ret_from_fork at ffffffff830414a1 > > #12 [ffffba974195ff50] ret_from_fork_asm at ffffffff830039ab > > > > And here's the resulting modprobe command, which is stuck waiting on the > > "kunit_run_lock" mutex: > > > > PID: 1512 TASK: ffff9aed143fafc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "modprobe" > > #0 [ffffba9741957990] __schedule at ffffffff83fd85f5 > > #1 [ffffba9741957a48] schedule at ffffffff83fd9672 > > #2 [ffffba9741957a60] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffff83fd9cb5 > > #3 [ffffba9741957a68] __mutex_lock.constprop.0 at ffffffff83fdc57a > > #4 [ffffba9741957ae8] __kunit_test_suites_init at ffffffffc0d5c95a [kunit] > > #5 [ffffba9741957b08] kunit_module_notify at ffffffffc0d5ba4b [kunit] > > #6 [ffffba9741957b78] notifier_call_chain at ffffffff8314647a > > #7 [ffffba9741957bb0] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust at ffffffff83146565 > > #8 [ffffba9741957bf8] load_module at ffffffff831e1935 > > #9 [ffffba9741957d58] __do_sys_init_module at ffffffff831e1fba > > #10 [ffffba9741957e30] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff83fc3461 > > #11 [ffffba9741957e48] __vm_munmap at ffffffff833bcdeb > > #12 [ffffba9741957ee8] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff83fc3470 > > #13 [ffffba9741957f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff840000ea > > RIP: 00007f8ba092b4ae RSP: 00007ffc771e0378 RFLAGS: 00000246 > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005572137e6e40 RCX: 00007f8ba092b4ae > > RDX: 0000557211c4de79 RSI: 0000000000080451 RDI: 00007f8b9ff90010 > > RBP: 00007ffc771e0430 R8: 00005572137e6010 R9: 0000000000000007 > > R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000557211c4de79 > > R13: 0000000000040000 R14: 00005572137e73b0 R15: 00005572137e6400 > > ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af CS: 0033 SS: 002b > > > > The camellia module doesn't even have any kunit tests, so __kunit_test_suites_init() > > is waiting to lock the "kunit_run_lock" mutex for nothing: > > > > crash> module -o | grep num_kunit > > [0x478] int num_kunit_init_suites; > > [0x488] int num_kunit_suites; > > crash> mod | grep camellia > > ffffffffc0da15c0 camellia_x86_64 ffffffffc0d99000 57344 (not loaded) [CONFIG_KALLSYMS] > > crash> px 0xffffffffc0da15c0+0x478 > > $1 = 0xffffffffc0da1a38 > > crash> px 0xffffffffc0da15c0+0x488 > > $2 = 0xffffffffc0da1a48 > > crash> rd 0xffffffffc0da1a38 > > ffffffffc0da1a38: 0000000000000000 ........ > > crash> rd 0xffffffffc0da1a48 > > ffffffffc0da1a48: 0000000000000000 ........ > > > > -Scott > > > -- > > > 2.44.0 > > > > > > > > >
