On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 12:55 PM Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:52 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Jan 18, 2024, at 4:44 AM, Martin Wege <martin.l.wege@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 2:57 AM Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 5:10 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> On Jan 13, 2024, at 10:09 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> On Sat, 2024-01-13 at 15:47 +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > >>>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 1:19 AM Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > Question is... should the values for |ca_*| be a tuneable, or just > increase the limit to |80| ([1]) ? Actually a tuneable (which defaults to |80|) would be good, since we have to test against different configs/kernels anyway, and a tuneable would help... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz@xxxxxxxxxxx \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
