Re: [PATCH] NFS: add a tracepoint for uniquifier of fscache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 发送时间: 2024年3月5日 23:28
> 收件人: anna@xxxxxxxxxx; 
> 抄送: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] NFS: add a tracepoint for uniquifier of fscache
> 
> On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 11:41 +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from chenhx.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx. Learn why
> > this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ;]
> >
> > Add a tracepoint to the mount fsc=xxx option
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > index 853e8d609bb3..fd8813222cd2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > @@ -652,6 +652,9 @@ static int nfs_fs_context_parse_param(struct
> > fs_context *fc,
> >                 ctx->fscache_uniq = NULL;
> >                 break;
> >         case Opt_fscache:
> > +               if (!param->string)
> > +                       goto out_invalid_value;
> > +               trace_nfs_mount_assign(param->key, param->string);
> 
> The description does not match the contents of the patch. Why would we
> need that extra check on top of the ones made by fs_param_is_string()?
> 

I take 5559405df652 ("nfs: fix possible null-ptr-deref when parsing param") for reference.
Maybe I misunderstand that fix.
I'll post a v2 without the null check, and with a proper description about commit message.

Regards,
- Chen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux