Re: [PATCH v10 00/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure
From: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:34:55 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jack@xxxxxxx" <jack@xxxxxxx>, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, "neilb@xxxxxxx" <neilb@xxxxxxx>, "kolga@xxxxxxxxxx" <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tom@xxxxxxxxxx" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>, "paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmorris@xxxxxxxxx" <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, "serge@xxxxxxxxxx" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>, "zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx" <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>, "dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx" <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx" <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx" <stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx>, "omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx" <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>, "casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "shuah@xxxxxxxxxx" <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mic@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240215103113.2369171-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240215103113.2369171-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>

> On Feb 15, 2024, at 3:30 AM, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The patch set applies on top of lsm/next, commit 97280fa1ed94 ("Automated
> merge of 'dev' into 'next'").

I have tested the ima appraisal portion and have not observed any regressions with
this series.  For that part of the code, if you want, feel free to add:

Tested-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v10 00/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure
  - From: Roberto Sassu

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nfsd: Fix a regression in nfsd_setattr()
Next by Date: Re: apparent scaling problem with delegations
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v10 0/25] security: Move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure
Next by thread: PATCH [v2 0/2] NFSD: use CB_GETATTR to handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]