On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 01:20 +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 22:23, Trond Myklebust > <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 01:14 +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 01:07, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does the following patch fix matters? > > > if (!xprt_lock_write(xprt, task)) > > return; > > + > > + if (test_and_clear_bit(XPRT_CLOSE_WAIT, &xprt->state)) > > + xprt->ops->close(xprt); > > + > > if (xprt_connected(xprt)) > > Sorry. No go. I got the following trace, I'm not sure if this is > relevant, because it is difficult to determine if the logging > corresponds to the experienced problem. > > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect_status: retrying > RPC: 14194 xprt_prepare_transmit > RPC: 14194 xprt_transmit(112) > RPC: disconnected transport cfa82400 > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect xprt cfa82400 is not connected > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect_status: retrying > RPC: 14194 xprt_prepare_transmit > RPC: 14194 xprt_transmit(112) > RPC: disconnected transport cfa82400 > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect xprt cfa82400 is not connected > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect_status: retrying > RPC: 14194 xprt_prepare_transmit > RPC: 14194 xprt_transmit(112) > RPC: disconnected transport cfa82400 > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect xprt cfa82400 is not connected > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect_status: retrying > RPC: 14194 xprt_prepare_transmit > RPC: 14194 xprt_transmit(112) > RPC: disconnected transport cfa82400 > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect xprt cfa82400 is not connected > RPC: 14194 xprt_connect_status: retrying > RPC: 14194 xprt_prepare_transmit > RPC: 14194 xprt_transmit(112) Did anything change w.r.t. the RPCDBG_TRANS (or better still - the RPCDBG_XPRT|RPCDBG_TRANS) trace? Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
