RE: Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting
From: Connor Smith <connor.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:39:22 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <B23AEE8C-2C4C-4DD0-904C-7BCD927CC4E0@oracle.com>
References: <DM8PR08MB72883F3D2AF2A0638CD41356E8732@DM8PR08MB7288.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <B23AEE8C-2C4C-4DD0-904C-7BCD927CC4E0@oracle.com>

> On first blush, your interpretation of S18.36.4 looks correct
> to me. We need to study this further and also look into how
> pynfs treats CREATE_SESSION retransmits. Please file a bug
> report here:

Thanks Chuck - I've raised https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218382

Thanks,
Connor

References:
- Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting
  - From: Connor Smith
- Re: Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting
  - From: Chuck Lever III

Prev by Date: Re: Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [nfs?] KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in sys_name_to_handle_at (4)
Previous by thread: Re: Possible discrepancy in CREATE_SESSION slot number accounting
Next by thread: [PATCH fstests] common/rc: NFSv2/3 do not support negative timestamps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux