On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:22:53PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote: > Ok, I still haven't had the "excact same" workload put on the host, but > it has been running on the patched kernel for 8 days now and I havent > seen load numbers over 32 while service 1100MB/s over NFS (dd'ing 512 > bytes blocks out of the server from the clients) while doing local disk > IO for an iowait of ~25% (4 cores sucking what they can). This workload > is "similar" to the one sending it to load numbers of over 100 earlier. > > So I'm confident that the problem is solved by reverting the patch. OK, I'm applying the revert for 2.6.33. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
