Re: [PATCH nfs-utils v2 2/2] testlk: format off_t as llong instead of ssize_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/21/23 4:15 PM, Ahelenia Ziemiańska wrote:
This, naturally, produces a warning on x32 (and other ILP32 platforms
with 64-bit off_t, presumably, but you need to ask for it explicitly
there usually):
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../support/include  -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/tmp/nfs-utils-2.6.3=. -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/pie-compile.specs -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/tmp/nfs-utils-2.6.3=. -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/pie-compile.specs -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o testlk-testlk.o `test -f 'testlk.c' || echo './'`testlk.c
testlk.c: In function ‘main’:
testlk.c:84:66: warning: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 4 has type ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Wformat=]
    84 |                         printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%zd;%zd)\n",
       |                                                                ~~^
       |                                                                  |
       |                                                                  int
       |                                                                %lld
    85 |                                 fname, fl.l_pid, fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
       |                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                                    |
       |                                                    __off_t {aka long long int}
testlk.c:84:70: warning: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘__off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Wformat=]
    84 |                         printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%zd;%zd)\n",
       |                                                                    ~~^
       |                                                                      |
       |                                                                      int
       |                                                                    %lld
    85 |                                 fname, fl.l_pid, fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
       |                                                              ~~~~~~~~
       |                                                                |
       |                                                                __off_t {aka long long int}

Upcast to long long, doesn't really matter.

It does, of course, raise the question of whether other bits of
nfs-utils do something equally broken that just isn't caught by the
format validator.

Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Committed... (tag: nfs-utils-2-7-1-rc1)

steved
---
Same as v1: <44adec629186e220ee5d8fd936980ac4a33dc510.1693754442.git.nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

  tools/locktest/testlk.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/locktest/testlk.c b/tools/locktest/testlk.c
index ea51f788..c9bd6bac 100644
--- a/tools/locktest/testlk.c
+++ b/tools/locktest/testlk.c
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
  		if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK) {
  			printf("%s: no conflicting lock\n", fname);
  		} else {
-			printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%zd;%zd)\n",
-				fname, fl.l_pid, fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
+			printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%lld;%lld)\n",
+				fname, fl.l_pid, (long long)fl.l_start, (long long)fl.l_len);
  		}
  		return 0;
  	}





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux