Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] NFSD: Fix "start of NFS reply" pointer passed to nfsd_cache_update()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 18:58 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 17, 2023, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:57:49AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 11:28 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > > From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > The "statp + 1" pointer that is passed to nfsd_cache_update() is
> > > > supposed to point to the start of the egress NFS Reply header. In
> > > > fact, it does point there for AUTH_SYS and RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 requests.
> > > > 
> > > > But both krb5i and krb5p add fields between the RPC header's
> > > > accept_stat field and the start of the NFS Reply header. In those
> > > > cases, "statp + 1" points at the extra fields instead of the Reply.
> > > > The result is that nfsd_cache_update() caches what looks to the
> > > > client like garbage.
> > > > 
> > > > A connection break can occur for a number of reasons, but the most
> > > > common reason when using krb5i/p is a GSS sequence number window
> > > > underrun. When an underrun is detected, the server is obliged to
> > > > drop the RPC and the connection to force a retransmit with a fresh
> > > > GSS sequence number. The client presents the same XID, it hits in
> > > > the server's DRC, and the server returns the garbage cache entry.
> > > > 
> > > > The "statp + 1" argument has been used since the oldest changeset
> > > > in the kernel history repo, so it has been in nfsd_dispatch()
> > > > literally since before history began. The problem arose only when
> > > > the server-side GSS implementation was added twenty years ago.
> > > > 
> > > > This particular patch applies cleanly to v6.5 and later, but needs
> > > > some context adjustment to apply to earlier kernels. Before v5.16,
> > > > nfsd_dispatch() does not use xdr_stream, so saving the NFS header
> > > > pointer before calling ->pc_encode is still an appropriate fix
> > > > but it needs to be implemented differently.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.16+
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c |    4 +++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > > > index d6122bb2d167..60aacca2bca6 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > > > @@ -981,6 +981,7 @@ int nfsd_dispatch(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > > > const struct svc_procedure *proc = rqstp->rq_procinfo;
> > > > __be32 *statp = rqstp->rq_accept_statp;
> > > > struct nfsd_cacherep *rp;
> > > > + __be32 *nfs_reply;
> > > > 
> > > > /*
> > > >  * Give the xdr decoder a chance to change this if it wants
> > > > @@ -1014,6 +1015,7 @@ int nfsd_dispatch(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > > > if (test_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags))
> > > > goto out_update_drop;
> > > > 
> > > > + nfs_reply = xdr_inline_decode(&rqstp->rq_res_stream, 0);
> > > > if (!proc->pc_encode(rqstp, &rqstp->rq_res_stream))
> > > > goto out_encode_err;
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -1023,7 +1025,7 @@ int nfsd_dispatch(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> > > >  */
> > > > smp_store_release(&rqstp->rq_status_counter, rqstp->rq_status_counter + 1);
> > > > 
> > > > - nfsd_cache_update(rqstp, rp, rqstp->rq_cachetype, statp + 1);
> > > > + nfsd_cache_update(rqstp, rp, rqstp->rq_cachetype, nfs_reply);
> > > > out_cached_reply:
> > > > return 1;
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > With this patch, I'm seeing a regression in pynfs RPLY14. In the
> > > attached capture the client sends a replay of an earlier call, and the
> > > server responds (frame #97) with a reply that is truncated just after
> > > the RPC accept state.
> > 
> > I've reproduced it. Looking now.
> 
> One line fix was squashed into "NFSD: Fix "start of NFS reply"
> pointer passed to nfsd_cache_update()". The new series is in
> the nfsd-fixes branch of my repo on kernel.org <http://kernel.org/>.
> 

LGTM. You can add this to the pile:

Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux