On 11/05/2009 12:09 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > I'm assuming Trond's objection is just to the patch changelog > (specifically, to the statement that any header "should be compilation > independent"), not to these specific changes. > > --b. Ping Bruce? Trond? whatsup? Can Benny put these patches in his tree? He said he would be happy to hold them for a while, but only if they will be eventually accepted into the tree as a pnfs pre-requisite. Please ACK on these patches? I have to make all these put-the-includes-back patches to just make the tree compile. Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
