Re: [PATCH 1/9] nfsd: hold ->cl_lock for hash_delegation_locked()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 13:18 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> The protocol for creating a new state in nfsd is to allocated the state
> leaving it largely uninitialised, add that state to the ->cl_stateids
> idr so as to reserve a state id, then complete initialisation of the
> state and only set ->sc_type to non-zero once the state is fully
> initialised.
> 
> If a state is found in the idr with ->sc_type == 0, it is ignored.
> The ->cl_lock list is used to avoid races - it is held while checking
> sc_type during lookup, and held when a non-zero value is stored in
> ->sc_type.
> 
> ... except... hash_delegation_locked() finalises the initialisation of a
> delegation state, but does NOT hold ->cl_lock.
> 
> So this patch takes ->cl_lock at the appropriate time w.r.t other locks,
> and so ensures there are no races (which are extremely unlikely in any
> case).
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 65fd5510323a..6368788a7d4e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,7 @@ hash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock);
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&fp->fi_lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
>  
>  	if (nfs4_delegation_exists(clp, fp))
>  		return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -5609,12 +5610,14 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&state_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
>  	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>  	if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
>  		status = -EAGAIN;
>  	else
>  		status = hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp);
>  	spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
>  	spin_unlock(&state_lock);
>  
>  	if (status)

I know it's (supposedly) an unlikely race, but should we send this to
stable?

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux