Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Replace strlcpy() with strscpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, Kees Cook wrote:
> strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. This read may exceed
> the destination size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead
> to linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated[1].
> Additionally, it returns the size of the source string, not the
> resulting size of the destination string. In an effort to remove strlcpy()
> completely[2], replace strlcpy() here with strscpy().
> 
> Explicitly handle the truncation case by returning the size of the
> resulting string.
> 
> If "nodename" was ever longer than sizeof(clnt->cl_nodename) - 1, this
> change will fix a bug where clnt->cl_nodelen would end up thinking there
> were more characters in clnt->cl_nodename than there actually were,
> which might have lead to kernel memory content exposures.
> 
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 [2]
> Co-developed-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index daa9582ec861..7afe02bdea4a 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -287,8 +287,14 @@ static struct rpc_xprt *rpc_clnt_set_transport(struct rpc_clnt *clnt,
>  
>  static void rpc_clnt_set_nodename(struct rpc_clnt *clnt, const char *nodename)
>  {
> -	clnt->cl_nodelen = strlcpy(clnt->cl_nodename,
> -			nodename, sizeof(clnt->cl_nodename));
> +	ssize_t copied;
> +
> +	copied = strscpy(clnt->cl_nodename,
> +			 nodename, sizeof(clnt->cl_nodename));
> +
> +	clnt->cl_nodelen = copied < 0
> +				? sizeof(clnt->cl_nodename) - 1
> +				: copied;
>  }

Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

If it were "copied == -E2BIG" instead of "copied < 0" it would be more
obvious why sizeof(...) is used in that case.
But we really want to do something sensible for *any* error message that
might be added in the future.. I guess.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


>  
>  static int rpc_client_register(struct rpc_clnt *clnt,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux